> Try wipe-all instead of clean-all? Work better thanks.
I will have a look at how the things are done for js.swc, eventually, try jquery.swc Frédéric THOMAS ---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now > have 1.9 in AS > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:48:19 +0000 > > Try wipe-all instead of clean-all? > > On 6/20/15, 6:41 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I did ant clean-all, all >> >> >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >>---------------------------------------- >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but >>>we now have 1.9 in AS >>> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:37:51 +0000 >>> >>> Hmm. The CI build passed, so that test supposedly passed for me and the >>> CI server. Are you running that test all by itself? Did you re-build all >>> of the other projects (compiler, compiler.jx) first? >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 6/20/15, 6:07 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>> OK, I got EXTERNC handling CLI and building a js.swc from Ant. Will >>>>> integrate it into the build over the weekend, but I think I am out of >>>>> Mike’s way now. >>>> >>>>Is that why I've got this error building falcon ? >>>> >>>>Running >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.codegen.externals.TestExternalsJSCompi >>>>le >>>>Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0,035 >>>>sec >>>>U:\sources\asf\flex\falcon\compiler.jx.tests\build.xml:64: Tests failed >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.actOnTestResult(J >>>>Un >>>>itTask.java:2150) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.execute(JUnitTask >>>>.j >>>>ava:1101) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.oneJunitThread(JU >>>>ni >>>>tTask.java:919) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.runTestsInThreads >>>>(J >>>>UnitTask.java:932) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.execute(JUnitTask >>>>.j >>>>ava:841) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:292) >>>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source) >>>> at >>>>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor >>>>Im >>>>pl.java:43) >>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) >>>> at >>>>org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:1 >>>>06 >>>>) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Frédéric THOMAS >>>> >>>> >>>>---------------------------------------- >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but >>>>>we now have 1.9 in AS >>>>> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 07:09:23 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> OK, I got EXTERNC handling CLI and building a js.swc from Ant. Will >>>>> integrate it into the build over the weekend, but I think I am out of >>>>> Mike’s way now. Then I will try Jquery externs in its own SWC unless >>>>> someone beats me to it. >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 6/18/15, 4:46 PM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Mike, >>>>>> >>>>>>It looks like EXTERNC needs to handle command-line arguments, >>>>>>correct? I >>>>>>will try to get that working. I am planning on using the same >>>>>>Configurator that MXMLJSC and COMPJSC use unless you can think of a >>>>>>reason >>>>>>not to. >>>>>> >>>>>>-Alex >>>>>> >>>>>>On 6/18/15, 3:57 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Yeah, I am probably going to leave this stuff to to other people if >>>>>>>they >>>>>>>so >>>>>>>choose. :) I could eventually parse that one to get something going >>>>>>>though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Mike >>>>>>> >>>>>>>BTW the jQuery will end up in separate SWC sooner than later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Michael Schmalle < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:27 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't remember using different modules in D3.js, they are all >>>>>>>>part of >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> same module I guess? Unless you mean Behaviors, Core, etc. from >>>>>>>>here: >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/API-Reference >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well I looked at this, I really want to try and get it but MAN >>>>>>>>>this >>>>>>>>stuff >>>>>>>>> takes a lot of time to write and I just don't have the time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I did find a piece of something that might get you going when we >>>>>>>>>get >>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>> compiler EXTERNC creating separate packages. Do me a favor and >>>>>>>>>look >>>>>>>>at >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> file and API, tell me how much is missing from it that you would >>>>>>>>>use >>>>>>>>> "regularly". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>https://github.com/lbondaryk/BrixClient/blob/master/src/externs/d3.v >>>>>>>>3. >>>>>>>>ex >>>>>>>>t >>>>>>>>erns.js >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looks a bit outdated, this one is for v3, whereas D3.js is at >>>>>>>>version >>>>>>>>3.1 >>>>>>>> now. Other than that, on a cursory glance, it looks like all the >>>>>>>>commonly >>>>>>>> used APIs are available. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Michael Schmalle < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Om, I am looking at d3, looks pretty impressive, what modules >>>>>>>>would >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>> using. They have good API and I could create a base externs file >>>>>>>> pretty >>>>>>>>>>> quick. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Michael Schmalle < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, but I am just throwing crap at the wall right now. :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you continue to amaze. FWIW, I think Jquery should be in >>>>>>>>its >>>>>>>>> own >>>>>>>>>>>>> swc. What do others think? Svg would go in js.swc since all >>>>>>>>> browser >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>> care about have these APIs, but the JS-framework-specific >>>>>>>>externs >>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably have their own swc. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/15, 12:42 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" >>>>>>>><[email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fantastic! This is huge. I will build something with it as >>>>>>>>soon >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>check it in. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any chance you can bring in d3.js as well? This looks like a >>>>>>>> good >>>>>>>>>>>>> source: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://github.com/federico-b/d3-externs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On that note, there is an extern file generator available >>>>>>>>here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.dotnetwise.com/Code/Externs/ Have you seen it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Om >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Michael Schmalle < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I decided I needed to give myself a severe headache, so I >>>>>>>> decided >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tackle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JQuery externals! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well 4 hours later and some swearing, I got it working >>>>>>>>pretty >>>>>>>>>> well, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to exclude a couple "inner classes", for the most part, it >>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>usable. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. This needs to be added to the build file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(contrib/externs/jquery-1.9.js) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the source location and needs to be placed with the >>>>>>>>others. >>>>>>>>> Same >>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> svg.js. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not really used jQuery much so.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class Main >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public function Main() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var div:HTMLDivElement = >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTMLDivElement(document.createElement("div")); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> div.innerHTML = "A nice Div element"; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> document.body.appendChild(div); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $("div").css("border", "2px solid green"); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://snag.gy/il5R6.jpg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://snag.gy/wyPcH.jpg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
