Hold on, I've still have the minor (?) issues:
- The tool bar for some steps goes beyond its container limits. - I've tried twice to download the nightly FlexJS SDK and had Error #3003: File or directory does not exist, actually D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\js\lib\google\closure-compiler\compiler.jar is not there, is that a minor temp issue ? main: copyfiles: [copy] Copying 0 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US/ant/lib [copy] Copying 14 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US/bin bin-legacy: [copy] Copying 11 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US/lib [copy] Copying 1 file to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\lib\mxmlc.jar [copy] Copying 15 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US/lib/external copy.jx.lib: [mkdir] Created directory D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\js\lib\google\closure-compiler [copy] Copying 1 file to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\js\lib\google\closure-compiler\compiler.jar Error #3003 Frédéric THOMAS ---------------------------------------- > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:14:25 +0000 > > I think enough folks have examined the source but it would be good to know > that it works in other countries > > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > ------ Original message------ > > From: Frédéric THOMAS > > Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 7:25 AM > > To: dev@flex.apache.org; > > Subject:RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > > >> You're right. Let's count the votes and move on. > > I was about to dedicate some time to test it but if you have already enough > votes, I'm fine with :-) > > Thanks, > Frédéric THOMAS > > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:58:04 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> From: e...@ixsoftware.nl >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >> Alex, >> >> You're right. Let's count the votes and move on. >> >> Contributions in the form of actual patches or even constructive comments >> are always welcome and will certainly be part of the next release (which >> everyone is free to create and put to a vote, btw). Just let's not let them >> interfere with the momentum the project has been having lately. >> >> Thank you for shepherding this release! >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Monday, June 22, 2015, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 6/22/15, 1:03 AM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>You suggested change corrects one the issues. The other one is you can >>>>set AIR_HOME to a 4.0 SDK, but if FLEX_HOME contains an air version other >>>>than 4.0 it will fail to compile. It will still fail to compile if you >>>>change the namespace. >>>> >>>>> And since it is a minor change, we wouldn't need another round of voting >>>>> for this change or we could simply carry the current votes forward. >>>> >>>>Fine by me. I don’t think anyone would have an issue to carry votes >>>>forward for just a read me change. >>> >>> Don’t get me wrong: making it easier to compile the source package is a >>> legitimate issue. But what I don’t get is why it helps the community more >>> to focus time and effort on another RC vs taking the same time and effort >>> on moving, for example, FlexJS further along. How does expending energy >>> on this issue help the community more, or put the foundation at risk, or >>> encourage participation instead of scaring away potential future release >>> managers. Why is delaying the release for this issue more important than >>> having N more people experience installation failures because they don’t >>> have their IE settings right? >>> >>> I’m all for someone taking the time to upgrade the build script to update >>> the -app.xml to maybe pull the namespace number from, maybe, >>> flex-sdk-description.xml so it always uses what folks have in their SDK. >>> And then that will go in a future release. IMO, folks who feel strongly >>> about this issue should go work on that. I want to get this release out >>> so we can see if our failure rate changes significantly, and try to create >>> new markets for Flex with FlexJS. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Alex >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl<http://www.ixsoftware.nl> >
