IIRC most of the projects have some pretty thorough unit tests as well. Mike
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:14 PM, jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for renaming it. make it part of the main package. that way we have to > commit to it. if we put it off to the side there's more "it's a side > project. we don't need to maintain it." > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J < > mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: > > > Good point, we should keep it the same then. However if we do have to > > reorganize it in the future, we can go over options then. > > > > -Mark > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 10:52 AM > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting AS3Commons > > > > > > I'd either leave it as is: org.as3commons > > Or add apache: org.apache.as3commons > > Or add apache.flex: org.apache.flex.as3commons > > Or hint at Apache Commons: org.apache.commons.as3 > > > > There is backward compatibility to be considered, so if we rename the > > packages folks would have to change their source code to use it, so I'd > > probably lean towards leaving it as is. > > > > -Alex > > > > >
