On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For literals, yes, we’d for the most part just pass the whole thing as a
> string to the constructor. The only exception I can think of is bracket
> notation:
>
> var foo:XML = <node><subnode attr={myAttr}>foo</subnode></node>;
> would have to become:
> var foo:XML = new XML('<node><subnode
> attr="‘+myAttr+’">foo</subnode></node>’);
>
> Wrapping the xml in a dummy node is a good idea. I like that. Thanks!
>
Another thing you may want to consider is the new back-tick quotes (` `) in
ES6:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/template_strings
