+1 binding
-Successful build from source. -Successfully compiled small test applications. -README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE fine. OS: Win7 64bit Java: 1.8 64bit. IDE: FlashDevelop 5.0.2 Flash Player: 20 - -Mark On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:04 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 Binding > > Tested the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65" > MD5 checksum matches > Good signature > Source kit build successful > Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0 and ant frameworks-rsls. > Build successful. > Flash Builder likes the new SDK. > Recompiled existing large Flex web application, everything runs fine > Recompiled exisiting large Flex mobile application, everything runs fine > > (App seems to be running faster. What did we do??) > > Thanks, > Om > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:24 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > +0 Binding > > > > Testing the source kits on Windows 7, 64 Bit, Java version "1.8.0_65" > > MD5 checksum matches > > Good signature > > Source kit build successful > > Ran ant -f installer.xml -Dair.sdk.version=19.0. Reports 'build > > successful, C:\temp\4.15.0_test is now an IDE compatible folder', but > > Flash Builder complains saying 'Directory does not contain a Flex SDK' > and > > AIR version 16.0 was downloaded. > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> Package > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/apache-flex-sdk- > >> 4.15.0-src.tar.gz > >> Java 1.7 > >> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 > >> Source kit signatures match: y > >> Source kit builds: y > >> README is ok: y > >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > >> NOTICE is ok: y > >> LICENSE is ok: y > >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y > >> No unapproved binaries: y > >> > >> Package > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache- > >> flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz > >> < > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.15.0-bin.tar.gz > > > >> Binary kit signatures match: y > >> NOTICE is ok: y > >> LICENSE is ok: y > >> No unapproved licenses or files in jars: y > >> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y > >> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y > >> > >> Thanks for being the RM. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 1/4/16, 1:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >This is a Apache Flex 4.15 release candidate 1. Please see the > >> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README. > >> > > >> >The release candidate can be found here; > >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/ > >> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.15.0/rc1/> > >> > > >> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements > on > >> >approving a release?", at: > >> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release> > >> > > >> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > >> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct > >> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > >> >- That you can compile from source package > >> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice > >> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser > >> >application > >> > > >> >Please vote to approve this release: > >> >+1 Approve the release > >> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why) > >> > > >> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > >> > > >> >The vote passes if there is: > >> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > >> >- More positive votes than negative votes > >> > > >> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please > >> don't > >> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want > >> to > >> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of > >> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote > during > >> >the voting process. > >> > > >> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release > and > >> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how > >> the > >> >PMC votes. > >> > > >> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR > >> >version you tested the SDK with. > >> > > >> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread > not > >> >this VOTE thread. > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >Justin > >> > >> > > >
