Almost exactly the same as a string, but you first need to get an ObjectURL:
The four bold lines are pretty much the only difference:
COMPILE::JS
{
if (_model.binary) {
var host:IUIBase = _strand as IUIBase;
(host.element as HTMLImageElement).addEventListener('load',
loadHandler, false);
host.addEventListener('sizeChanged',
sizeChangedHandler);
if(_objectURL)
URLUtils.revokeObjectURL(_objectURL);
var blob:Blob = new Blob([_model.binary.array]);
_objectURL = URLUtils.createObjectURL(blob);
(host.element as HTMLImageElement).src = _objectURL;
}
}
All the URLUtils class does is call URL.createObjectURL() and
URL.revokeObjectURL(), but it deals with the differences in browsers.
On Aug 8, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> How do you set a binary image to a <img> tag in HTML?
>
> Otherwise, my first reaction is that this sounds like a separate
> BitmapImage component.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> On 8/8/16, 6:06 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think it should be possible to specify a url source as a string.
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How about a "source" property accepting source objects having UrlSource
>>> and BinarySource implementations?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>>> Von: Harbs <[email protected]>
>>> Datum: 08.08.16 12:55 (GMT+01:00)
>>> An: dev <[email protected]>
>>> Betreff: FlexJS Image.source
>>>
>>> I’m implementing support for setting binary data to images.
>>>
>>> Currently, Image (and ImageModel, etc.) has a source property and a
>>> urlChanged event.
>>>
>>> I can do one of two things:
>>>
>>> 1. I can change source to url and add a binary property. This would go
>>> along with a “binaryChanged” event.
>>> 2. I can change source to untyped and allow setting (and getting) of
>>> either strings or BinaryData. I think the event name should be changed
>>> to “sourceChanged”.
>>>
>>> I started implementing it the first way, but I wanted to hear if anyone
>>> has a compelling reason to do it the second way.
>>>
>>> Harbs
>>
>
