Hi, > Should we also take care of license issues cause we grab [2] and create a > new file of it [3]?
[2] is MIT licensed so IMO it wouldn’t hurt it add a pointer of that MIT to our LICENSE file. That way all bases are covered. There is an issue here (similar with certain other 3rd parties) in they don’t actualy have a MIT header or MIT license file we can copy (that I could find from a quick look). To comply with the MIT license file you need to include the license text. There was a discussion on legal discuss about this recently the upshot being you should contact the 3rd party and ask them (nicely) to add the license test/header and/or add a header in our code for them. Thanks, Justin
