Justin Mclean wrote > I’m not a lawyer but looking at the file I’d use the MIT header only.
This is the modified AwesomeUtils.as [1] which includes the update to FontAwesome 4.7 and the MIT licence header that replaces the Apache license header. If this is ok I'll commit it to the origin Flex repo soon (including the FontAwesome.otf). Should I commit it to the 4.16.0 branch? Thanks, Olaf [1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flex-sdk/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/flatspark/src/flatspark/utils/AwesomeUtils.as -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/New-Flex-SDK-release-tp56153p56195.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
