I am curious, what do you guys think about Flash Player and Flash Platform's situation today? is it better or worse than expected 5/6 years ago?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > I'm not really paying much attention to webasm. Got too much to do right > now. > > Volunteers are welcome to make Flex->WebASM happen. The compiler is set > up to have alternate emitters, but I'm wondering if it will be faster to > leverage a different tool. We currently use Google Closure Compiler for > optimizing JS. If Google comes up with a JS->WebASM compiler, we might > leverage that instead. > > Of course, I could be wrong... > -Alex > > On 3/13/17, 1:58 PM, "Jason Taylor" <ja...@dedoose.com> wrote: > > >So I'm sure many of you are aware that FireFox just added support for Web > >Assembly, Chrome should have it in the next release, and IE will be > >adding it shortly as well. Performance measurements on WebASM vs HTMl > >are increadibe, and WebASM appears to be even way more performant than > >Flash (in addition to way better multi-threading). > > > >I was wondering if anyone on the Flex teams is considering looking into > >possibilities involving WebASM? I know it's far fetched but dosen't > >hurt to ask right? In an ideal world the ability to cross compile > >flash/flex apps to WebASM, or a Falcon output to WebASM for FlexJS. > > > > > >
