Yes, Chris does have a good point and from now on* I will definitely use feature branches. I thought I could squeeze this through.
I checked in changes to Chart that should make it compile. I doubt it will run, but that is on the list. I will look into MDL now. That will take longer. I am leary about doing the rollback at this point. You should be able to remove MDL from the build temporarily. If you are relying on it, I will try to be as quick as possible and test against the MDL example before pushing my changes. * I will use feature branches once I get MDL working. Apologies, ‹peter On 3/23/17, 1:31 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Sure. Including me. > >But Chris does have a point that we should be using feature branches more >than we are. > >The tone of my question might have not come across correctly. I meant to >ask how difficult it would be to move all changes to a feature branch and >push the feature branch. If it¹s too difficult, we can just continue to >fix the develop branch for now. > >> On Mar 23, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Peter warned the list that his changes would break some things >>temporarily, >> and he asked if he should proceed. Everyone who responded said that it >>was >> okay. >> >> - Josh >> >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Very good question. >>> >>> Peter, is there any chance to roll back containers and layouts and move >>> all the changes to a feature branch until things are stable? >>> >>>> On Mar 23, 2017, at 7:58 AM, Christofer Dutz >>>><christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why don't you guys use feature branches? >>> >>> >
