On 4/19/17, 1:29 AM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes I was thinking more in terms of the times I did this type of thing to >support nested typed objects from raw json, more than simple VOs. Not so >much in terms of using reviver, but going through from json -> generic >object -> typed object with most of the support for the last part being in >the abstract base class, and extra field mappings to complex field types >defined in subclasses for specific fields. It was maintainable at the >individual class level, but still quite complicated. Poor man's amf. > >Probably not relevant here for simple VOs. Did you look at the AMFX classes (not regular AMF)? It might serve as a starting point for a JSON version. [1] https://books.google.com/books?id=qtlUSkC4HRQC&pg=PT1458&lpg=PT1458&dq=AMFX +specification+adobe&source=bl&ots=1Hx1n3jo0d&sig=puxfHwWuDSkP-jwbXVKGFmriy 64&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipx8fAp7PTAhXpsVQKHSL1Cf4Q6AEIRjAH#v=onepage&q=AMF X%20specification%20adobe&f=false -Alex
