I’m not sure why, but Royale does not resonate very well with me. Bend Bead and Strand are all good names as far as I’m concerned.
I personally like Limber/Limbre. I like Boinga in a different way. I think that Böja has a great ring to it. One way I was thinking about a vote was by allowing everyone to pick up to three options. Option 1 would count for 3 points, option 2 for 2 and option 3 for 1. We could then tally up the points for the winners. At that point we could either pick the one with the most points or call another vote to decide between the two with the most points. Thoughts? Harbs > On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Dave says, and I agree, that if there is more than one candidate, we might > need to use a more complicated voting system like STeVe. What other > suggestions do you think have been popular enough to make a second > candidate? I think FlexJS has been rejected as the project name. > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to this > post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or > not. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki >> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote >>> YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his own >>> name idea and others can give him +1. >>> >> >> There were several suggestions, some of which we could consider. We >> should >> probably let the FlexJS yes/no settle down before we start another thread. >> All this feels a bit rushed, I am having a bit of a hard time following >> discussions/decisions. >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> >>> >>> Piotr >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:39 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> As Alex said I also didn't answer for any single email from someone >>> who >>>> would like to start from scratch app or even would be new Flex world. >>>> >>>> We may get such people in the future, but we need to go with path >>> where >>>> first target will be ports the old one applications. >>>> >>>> As for the bad press - 4 years ago I have started work in a company >>> as an >>>> Flex Developer. This company grows on Flex development. Currently they >>>> change the direction as many others, but I have to say that anyone >>> from >>>> initial 20 people said anything wrong about Flex. Just the opposite >>> there >>>> were very good press out there in the company as in outside in Cracow. >>>> >>>> I'm all for having product FlexJS. We cannot abandon such tremendous >>>> opportunity. Look in the message from Rui in the VOTE thread - This is >>> what >>>> we need to provide in order to read next time. I've choose FlexJS for >>> the >>>> port, cause it provides me what I need. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017, 18:09 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target >>> called >>>>>> "Dover". >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you testing the non-native speakers? >>>>> >>>>> I spilt some of my coffee over that one ;-) >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>> >>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>> I. >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data >>> =02%7C01%7C%7C4127f1b06d7f43f4310808d4fc59ca2f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636410909953528643&sdata=BTLJuY5ffdBpl7z%2B%2FPa%2FHfu >>> ogqLc38DybDD2qL8oF78%3D&reserved=0 >>>>> >>>> >>> >
