I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail. I changed it again.
You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually increase the vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. -Alex On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( > >EdB > > > >On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went >>before >> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. >> >> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can >>break >> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, >>right?) >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> What a dilemma! >>> >>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted >>>to >>> see what the trend was first. >>> >>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, >>>Royale >>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have 10. >>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of >>>those >>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times, >>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). Royale, >>>Limber >>> have 2 first place votes each. >>> >>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will depend on how >>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS either given >>>the >>> other vote. >>> >>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality >>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major >>>hindrance? >>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is >>>already >>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as a show >>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their >>> opinion. >>> >>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is >>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? >>> >>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading this >>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker >>>redirect >>> issue is worrisome. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> -Alex >>> >>> >>> [1] >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub. >>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff >>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&s >>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>> Muppirala" >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Abstain (binding) >>> > >>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I am abstaining for now. >>> >> >>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >>> >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi, >>> >> > >>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of >>> >>FlexJS >>> >> > project. >>> >> > >>> >> > LIST: >>> >> > >>> >> > Royale >>> >> > Boja >>> >> > Strand >>> >> > Bead >>> >> > Limber >>> >> > Boinga >>> >> > Braid >>> >> > Arise >>> >> > >>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE: >>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most >>> favorite >>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have >>> >>choose >>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow >>>it >>> >>in >>> >> > their lists >>> >> > >>> >> > EXAMPLE: >>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points >>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points >>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point >>> >> > >>> >> > WINNER: >>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name. >>> >> > >>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> > >>> >> > Piotr >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> >> I. >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data >>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU >>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 >> > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data= >02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178 >decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUtfl >EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
