Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
:) Carlos 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > Thanks Piotr. > > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-) > > Harbs > > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > > > >> Justin voted. > >> > >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. > >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. > >> > >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. > >> Limber on 6 out of 12. > >> > >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads > have > >> 2. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -Alex > >> > >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >> > >>> Piotr changed his vote. > >>> > >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13. > >>> Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. > >>> > >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > >>> > >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they > aren't > >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with > >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. > >>> > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote. > >>>> > >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. > >>>> > >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. > >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. > >>>> > >>>> -Alex > >>>> > >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 > vs > >>>>> 12. > >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult > >>>>> site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. > >>>>> > >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been > >>>>> mentioned > >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times. > >>>>> > >>>>> -Alex > >>>>> > >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for > Gmail. > >>>>>> I > >>>>>> changed it again. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone > can > >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually increase > the > >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> EdB > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went > >>>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I > can > >>>>>>>> break > >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes, > >>>>>>>> right?) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> EdB > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui > >>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I > >>>>>>>>> wanted > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to > third, > >>>>>>>>> Royale > >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber > have > >>>>>>>>> 10. > >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> those > >>>>>>>>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 > >>>>>>>>> times, > >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). > Royale, > >>>>>>>>> Limber > >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will depend > on > >>>>>>>>> how > >>>>>>>>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS either > >>>>>>>>> given > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> other vote. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with > >>>>>>>>> low-quality > >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major > >>>>>>>>> hindrance? > >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is > >>>>>>>>> already > >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as a > >>>>>>>>> show > >>>>>>>>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get > their > >>>>>>>>> opinion. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name > >>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After > reading > >>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker > >>>>>>>>> redirect > >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>>>>>> -Alex > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit > >>>>>>>>> h > >>>>>>>>> u > >>>>>>>>> b > >>>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C% > >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08 > >>>>>>>>> d > >>>>>>>>> 4 > >>>>>>>>> f > >>>>>>>>> f > >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% > >> 7C6364143732119862 > >>>>>>>>> 8 > >>>>>>>>> 8 > >>>>>>>>> & > >>>>>>>>> s > >>>>>>>>> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > >>>>>>>>> Muppirala" > >>>>>>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > >>>>>>>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for > >>>>>>>>> fork > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS > >>>>>>>>>>>> project. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja > >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead > >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga > >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid > >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE: > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most > >>>>>>>>> favorite > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you > >>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>> choose > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can > >>>>>>>>> follow > >>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE: > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER: > >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the > >>>>>>>>> name. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> > >>>>>>>> I. > >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> www.ixsoftware.nl& > >>>>>>>> d > >>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>> t > >>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > >>>>>>>> d > >>>>>>>> 2 > >>>>>>>> c > >>>>>>>> 1 > >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu > >>>>>>>> % > >>>>>>>> 2 > >>>>>>>> B > >>>>>>>> U > >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 > >>>>>>> I. > >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d > >>>>>>> a > >>>>>>> t > >>>>>>> a > >>>>>>> = > >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 > >>>>>>> c > >>>>>>> 1 > >>>>>>> 7 > >>>>>>> 8 > >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B > >>>>>>> U > >>>>>>> t > >>>>>>> f > >>>>>>> l > >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > mobile: +48 880 859 557 > > skype: zarzycki10 > > > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> > > -- <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
