Om, In pony [1] and nabble [2] it displays differently.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@flex.apache.org [2] http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-What-should-be-the-new-Project-Name-for-Proposed-fork-of-FlexJS-td64433.html Piotr 2017-09-19 20:13 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > Erik, > > > > You should do this on the VOTE thread. > > > > This is the VOTE thread. At least that is what my gmail thinks it is... > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > > > > I'm changing my vote to: > > > > > > 1) Limb(e)r > > > 2) Bead(s) > > > 3) Braid > > > > > > Sorry for any confusion. > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> What a dilemma! > > >> > > >> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I wanted > to > > >> see what the trend was first. > > >> > > >> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third, > > Royale > > >> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber have 10. > > >> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of > > those > > >> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times, > > >> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). Royale, > > Limber > > >> have 2 first place votes each. > > >> > > >> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will depend on > how > > >> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS either given > > the > > >> other vote. > > >> > > >> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality > > >> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major > hindrance? > > >> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is > > already > > >> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that as a show > > >> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their > > >> opinion. > > >> > > >> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is > > >> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > > >> > > >> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading > this > > >> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell checker > > redirect > > >> issue is worrisome. > > >> > > >> Thoughts? > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> > > >> [1] https://github.com/ian-culleton/royale > > >> > > >> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > > Muppirala" > > >> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Abstain (binding) > > >>> > > >>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I am abstaining for now. > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > > >>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of > > >>>> FlexJS > > >>>>> project. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> LIST: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Royale > > >>>>> Boja > > >>>>> Strand > > >>>>> Bead > > >>>>> Limber > > >>>>> Boinga > > >>>>> Braid > > >>>>> Arise > > >>>>> > > >>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE: > > >>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most > > favorite > > >>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have > > >>>> choose > > >>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow > it > > >>>> in > > >>>>> their lists > > >>>>> > > >>>>> EXAMPLE: > > >>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points > > >>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points > > >>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point > > >>>>> > > >>>>> WINNER: > > >>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Piotr > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
