Well, it isn't official until the board approves, hopefully tomorrow. I updated the board resolution, and modified the board report and added "Apache Royale will take responsibility for what is now Apache FlexJS and related repos."
I also updated the PODLINGNAMESEARCH JIRA issue. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-132 Thanks, -Alex On 9/20/17, 12:29 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was >the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine. > >:) > >Carlos > >2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks Piotr. >> >> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-) >> >> Harbs >> >> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Piotr >> > >> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: >> > >> >> Justin voted. >> >> >> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points. >> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9. >> >> >> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes. >> >> Limber on 6 out of 12. >> >> >> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3. Royale and Beads >> have >> >> 2. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Piotr changed his vote. >> >>> >> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at >>13. >> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points. Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8. >> >>> >> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. >> >>> >> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they >> aren't >> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with >> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks. >> >>> >> >>> -Alex >> >>> >> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote. >> >>>> >> >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each. Beads now has 11. >> >>>> >> >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes. >> >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times. >> >>>> >> >>>> -Alex >> >>>> >> >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Erik changed his vote. That put Limber in the lead over Royale, >>13 >> vs >> >>>>> 12. >> >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an >>adult >> >>>>> site. Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now. Boja and Royale have been >> >>>>> mentioned >> >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -Alex >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for >> Gmail. >> >>>>>> I >> >>>>>> changed it again. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote >>alone >> can >> >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference. You could actually >>increase >> the >> >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-( >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> EdB >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin >><e...@ixsoftware.nl >> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with >>went >> >>>>>>>> before >> >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If >>I >> can >> >>>>>>>> break >> >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE >>closes, >> >>>>>>>> right?) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> EdB >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui >> >>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma! >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions. I haven't voted yet. I >> >>>>>>>>> wanted >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to >> third, >> >>>>>>>>> Royale >> >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely: Bead, Boja and Limber >> have >> >>>>>>>>> 10. >> >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), >>but 3 >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>>> are third place votes. Royale and Limber have been mentioned >>5 >> >>>>>>>>> times, >> >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times. Beads has the most first place votes (3). >> Royale, >> >>>>>>>>> Limber >> >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner. It will >>depend >> on >> >>>>>>>>> how >> >>>>>>>>> you count the votes. And we can't default back to FlexJS >>either >> >>>>>>>>> given >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> other vote. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with >> >>>>>>>>> low-quality >> >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major >> >>>>>>>>> hindrance? >> >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github >>project is >> >>>>>>>>> already >> >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework. Does anybody see that >>as a >> >>>>>>>>> show >> >>>>>>>>> stopper? I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get >> their >> >>>>>>>>> opinion. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which >>name >> >>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After >> reading >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber. The spell >>checker >> >>>>>>>>> redirect >> >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >> >>>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit >> >>>>>>>>> h >> >>>>>>>>> u >> >>>>>>>>> b >> >>>>>>>>> . >> >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C% >> >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08 >> >>>>>>>>> d >> >>>>>>>>> 4 >> >>>>>>>>> f >> >>>>>>>>> f >> >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0% >> >> 7C6364143732119862 >> >>>>>>>>> 8 >> >>>>>>>>> 8 >> >>>>>>>>> & >> >>>>>>>>> s >> >>>>>>>>> >>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of >>OmPrakash >> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala" >> >>>>>>>>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" >><dave2w...@comcast.net> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >> >>>>>>>>>>> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for >> >>>>>>>>> fork >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS >> >>>>>>>>>>>> project. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the >>most >> >>>>>>>>> favorite >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>>>> choose >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can >> >>>>>>>>> follow >> >>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of >>the >> >>>>>>>>> name. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295> >> >>>>>>>> I. >> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data >>=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=HW3%2FlgNCS3Qq6Zj75EWw7RkFj99 >>TBeSMdm6AwkIIxlI%3D&reserved=0& >> >>>>>>>> d >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> t >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 >> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >> >>>>>>>> d >> >>>>>>>> 2 >> >>>>>>>> c >> >>>>>>>> 1 >> >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= >> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu >> >>>>>>>> % >> >>>>>>>> 2 >> >>>>>>>> B >> >>>>>>>> U >> >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >> >>>>>>> I. >> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data >>=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1 >>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=HW3%2FlgNCS3Qq6Zj75EWw7RkFj99 >>TBeSMdm6AwkIIxlI%3D&reserved=0&d >> >>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>> t >> >>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>> = >> >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80 >> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 >> >>>>>>> c >> >>>>>>> 1 >> >>>>>>> 7 >> >>>>>>> 8 >> >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata= >> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B >> >>>>>>> U >> >>>>>>> t >> >>>>>>> f >> >>>>>>> l >> >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> > mobile: +48 880 859 557 >> > skype: zarzycki10 >> > >> > LinkedIn: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke >>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d >>9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=m >>kPQ8Ry9xSap37GUzB%2BvmR2EqXyDGPAFPFcDCoPKZe0%3D&reserved=0 >> > >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link >>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49d >>b794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364148939 >>56825588&sdata=Q3Hkrg9yqHXyFL5viNwjc5q6b2Z1tuyAxfdPeMqH6Xo%3D&reserved=0> >> >> > > >-- > ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo >scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b >34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=3MisyBrPKGqZ7z4i >QVxDpOMznv9gUoDFhSeYtVm26Xs%3D&reserved=0> > >Carlos Rovira > >Director General > >M: +34 607 22 60 05 > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos >copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 >4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=3MisyBrPKGqZ7z4iQ >VxDpOMznv9gUoDFhSeYtVm26Xs%3D&reserved=0 > >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avant2 >.es&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443879 >4aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=JjRskfAvu4rheYg8hO2abpm >yhf9ZktDSMpW%2F6vHTxUo%3D&reserved=0 > > >Conocenos en 1 minuto! ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be >%2FP2IEAYDG5HU&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=LI9sNMGAL%2F >sODdrsZrdFpBfud5V3vRJSGFvXwRQ7olU%3D&reserved=0> > > >Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener >información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por >error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y >proceda a su destrucción. > >De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le >comunicamos >que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC >S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del >servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, >rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a >nuestras >oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación >necesaria.
