@Chiwan: There are a few mentionings of the Scala version in the docs as well. For example in "docs/index.md" and on the website under "downloads".
We should make sure we explain on these pages that there are downloads for various Scala versions. Cheers, Stephan On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Alexander Alexandrov < [email protected]> wrote: > Great, I just posted some comments / improvement suggestions. > > I have to say I'm still not 100% convinced by the strategy not to add a > suffix to all modules. Here is a small example that illustrates my > concerns. > > Consider the following chained dependency situation. We have pure Java > artifact *flink-pure-java* which depends on a Scala artifact > *flink-some-scala-A*, which in turn depends on *flink-some-scala-B*. > > Let's say the user has directly included *flink-pure-java* and > *flink-some-scala-B* in the his project and wants to build for Scala 2.11. > We end up with a situation like this > > - flink-pure-java > `- flink-some-scala-A > `- flink-some-scala-B > - flink-some-scala-B_2.11 > > We end up having both versions of *flink-some-scala-B* in our project. > > > > 2015-07-03 12:24 GMT+02:00 Chiwan Park <[email protected]>: > > > Hi All, > > I created a PR for this issue. [1] Please check and comment about the PR. > > > > Regards, > > Chiwan Park > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/885 > > > > > On Jul 2, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Chiwan Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > @Alexander I’m happy to hear that you want to help me. If you help me, > I > > really appreciate. :) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Chiwan Park > > > > > > > > >> On Jul 2, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Alexander Alexandrov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> @Chiwan: let me know if you need hands-on support. I'll be more then > > happy to help (as my downstream project is using Scala 2.11). > > >> > > >> 2015-07-01 17:43 GMT+02:00 Chiwan Park <[email protected]>: > > >> Okay, I will apply this suggestion. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Chiwan Park > > >> > > >>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Ufuk Celebi <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 01 Jul 2015, at 10:34, Stephan Ewen <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1, like that approach > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> I like that this is not breaking for non-Scala users :-) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
