Thanks Till for bringing this up. This is one of the blockers we r facing now for Flink-Mahout integration.
It would be great to have this in 0.10. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > I found another issue (FLINK-2894 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while helping the > mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we don't allow > to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is not possible to > specify a serializer for a base class and all its subclasses. In order to > push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to include a fix for > it in 0.10. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel <sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for streaming > > > programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to give more > > > meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not > > > compatible with the detached execution mode. > > > > I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it then. But something > > needs to be done about it. :') > > > > > @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of old jobs to > > > be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5). > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri > > > <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows the last 5 > > finished > > > > jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5. > > > > I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for the old > > interface > > > > and broken again in the new one? > > > > Shall I open another issue or is there something I need to configure > in > > the > > > > new web interface and I haven't? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -V. > > > > > > > > On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888 > > > >> > > > >> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a bit by > > streaming > > > >> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are always > > one-shot > > > >> currently. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels < > m...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :) > > > >> > > > > >> > I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to start > > testing the > > > >> > release candidate. We might discover more issues on the way. In > the > > > >> > meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push those to > the > > > >> > release-0.10 branch. > > > >> > > > > >> > Eager execution calls are not supported by the detached YARN > > execution > > > >> > mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a detached > > mode. > > > >> > Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for programs > that > > try > > > >> to > > > >> > submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In the course > of > > > >> > throwing a proper exception, he also added detached execution mode > > > >> support > > > >> > for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager execution > > doesn't > > > >> > work with detached programs is that the client submits the first > > Flink > > > >> job > > > >> > (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then > > returns an > > > >> > empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user program > tries > > to > > > >> > access the ExecutionResult. > > > >> > > > > >> > Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the release. > I > > would > > > >> > like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest to > > disable > > > >> > detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can include a > > proper > > > >> > support for the next release. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel < > > sachingoel0...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is faulty > > for > > > >> > > interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most basic > > > >> starting > > > >> > > point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n <> > > > >> > > examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- Sachin Goel > > > >> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi > > > >> > > m. +91-9871457685 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > +1 to that, Stephan. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > From: Stephan Ewen > > > >> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 > > > >> > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 > > (release-0.10.0-rc0) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found > > another > > > >> > blocker > > > >> > > > bug, so this RC will need a few patches. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would actually > > be the > > > >> > > > desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a release > > > >> blocker. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if possible, but > > not > > > >> > block > > > >> > > > the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. Good to > > fix > > > >> > them, > > > >> > > > but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 SNAPSHOT > right > > now > > > >> > and > > > >> > > > too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be available > in > > a > > > >> > > release. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > How about we start testing anyways, because I would expect us > to > > find > > > >> > > more > > > >> > > > issues, and we save time if we do not create a new release > > candidate > > > >> > for > > > >> > > > each patch. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < > > > >> > > pomperma...@okkam.it > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 could > be > > > >> worth > > > >> > of > > > >> > > > > further investigations before this release > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Best, > > > >> > > > > Flavio > > > >> > > > > On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyf...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge :) > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Unfortunately I have to say -1 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point of > > view. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Cheers, > > > >> > > > > > Gyula > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> ezt írta > > (időpont: > > > >> > > 2015. > > > >> > > > > okt. > > > >> > > > > > 21., Sze, 20:07): > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Awesome! Thanks Max :)) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have a couple of questions: > > > >> > > > > > > - what about the blocker issue (according to the wiki) > > > >> > FLINK-2747? > > > >> > > > > > > - weren't we going to get rid of staging altogether? > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Cheers, > > > >> > > > > > > -V. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen < > > se...@apache.org > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Super, thanks Max! > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > We should also bump the master to the next version > then, > > to > > > >> > > > separate > > > >> > > > > > what > > > >> > > > > > > > goes into release fixes and what goes into the next > > > >> version... > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a > separate > > > >> > thread, > > > >> > > I > > > >> > > > > > > guess... > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian Michels < > > > >> > > > m...@apache.org> > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Release candidates have to be tested thoroughly. > > > >> Therefore, I > > > >> > > > would > > > >> > > > > > > like > > > >> > > > > > > > > everybody to take a look at the release page in the > > wiki: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I've compiled the checks into a document. I would > like > > > >> > everyone > > > >> > > > to > > > >> > > > > > > assign > > > >> > > > > > > > > one of the checks in the documents to test the > release > > > >> > > candidate: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian Michels > < > > > >> > > > > m...@apache.org> > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear community, > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The past months we have been working very hard to > > push > > > >> > > towards > > > >> > > > > > 0.10. > > > >> > > > > > > I > > > >> > > > > > > > > > would like to propose the first release candidate. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > =================================== > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate > as > > > >> Apache > > > >> > > > Flink > > > >> > > > > > > > version > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 0.10.0: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The commit to be voted on: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Branch: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc0 (see > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git > > > >> > > ) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found > > at: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/ > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the key with > > > >> fingerprint > > > >> > > > > > C2909CBF: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The staging repository for this release can be > found > > at: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache > > Flink > > > >> > 0.10.0. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes > if > > a > > > >> > > majority > > > >> > > > > of > > > >> > > > > > at > > > >> > > > > > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > =================================== > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >
