I was also thinking of deprecating that. With that, RichFunctions should change "open(Configuration)" --> "open()".
Would be heavily API breaking, so bit hesitant there... On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the hint Matthias. > So actually the parameter of the open() method is useless? IMHO that does > not look like a nice API design... > We should try to keep DataSet and DataStream API in sync. > Does it make sense to deprecate withParameters() for 1.0? > > Timo > > > On 24.11.2015 14:31, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > >> We had this discussion a while ago. >> >> If I recall correctly, "withParameters()" is not encourage to be used in >> DataSet either. >> >> This is the thread: >> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201509.mbox/%3C55EC69CD.1070003%40apache.org%3E >> >> -Matthias >> >> On 11/24/2015 02:14 PM, Timo Walther wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I want to set the Configuration of a streaming operator and access it >>> via the open method of the RichFunction. >>> There is no possibility to set the Configuration of the open method at >>> the moment, right? Can I open an issue for a withParameters() equivalent >>> for the Stremaing API? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Timo >>> >>> >
