Agree with @till +1 to change this now On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> If not API breaking before 1.0, then probably never? > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I was also thinking of deprecating that. With that, RichFunctions should > > change "open(Configuration)" --> "open()". > > > > Would be heavily API breaking, so bit hesitant there... > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the hint Matthias. > > > So actually the parameter of the open() method is useless? IMHO that > does > > > not look like a nice API design... > > > We should try to keep DataSet and DataStream API in sync. > > > Does it make sense to deprecate withParameters() for 1.0? > > > > > > Timo > > > > > > > > > On 24.11.2015 14:31, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > > > >> We had this discussion a while ago. > > >> > > >> If I recall correctly, "withParameters()" is not encourage to be used > in > > >> DataSet either. > > >> > > >> This is the thread: > > >> > > >> > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201509.mbox/%3C55EC69CD.1070003%40apache.org%3E > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > >> > > >> On 11/24/2015 02:14 PM, Timo Walther wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I want to set the Configuration of a streaming operator and access it > > >>> via the open method of the RichFunction. > > >>> There is no possibility to set the Configuration of the open method > at > > >>> the moment, right? Can I open an issue for a withParameters() > > equivalent > > >>> for the Stremaing API? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Timo > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >
