+1 on deprecating the old Python API in 1.9 release.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:07 AM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for this proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Dian
>
> 在 2019年6月12日,上午8:24,jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 写道:
>
> big +1 for the proposal.
>
> We will soon complete all the Python API functional development of the 1.9
> release, the development of UDFs will be carried out. After the support of
> UDFs is completed, it will be very natural to support Datastream API.
>
> If all of us agree with this proposal, I believe that for the 1.10
> release, it is possible to complete support both UDFs and DataStream API.
> And we will do our best to make the 1.10 release that contains the Python
> DataStream API support.
>
> So, great thanks to @Stephan for this proposal!
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
> Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2019年6月11日周二 下午10:56写道:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> 于2019年6月11日周二 下午10:52写道:
>>
>>> It is reasonable as stephan explained. +1 from my side!
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> From:Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
>>> Send Time:2019年6月11日(星期二) 22:11
>>> To:Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>>> Cc:user <u...@flink.apache.org>; dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
>>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate previous Python APIs
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年6月11日周二 下午9:30写道:
>>>
>>> > Hi all!
>>> >
>>> > I would suggest to deprecating the existing python APIs for DataSet and
>>> > DataStream API with the 1.9 release.
>>> >
>>> > Background is that there is a new Python API under development.
>>> > The new Python API is initially against the Table API. Flink 1.9 will
>>>
>>> > support Table API programs without UDFs, 1.10 is planned to support UDFs.
>>> > Future versions would support also the DataStream API.
>>> >
>>> > In the long term, Flink should have one Python API for DataStream and
>>>
>>> > Table APIs. We should not maintain multiple different implementations and
>>> > confuse users that way.
>>>
>>> > Given that the existing Python APIs are a bit limited and not under active
>>> > development, I would suggest to deprecate them in favor of the new API.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > Stephan
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Jeff Zhang
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to