+1 for deprecation. It’s very reasonable.
> 在 2019年6月12日，下午5:32，Till Rohrmann <[email protected]> 写道：
>
> +1 for deprecation.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:31 AM Hequn Cheng <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 on the proposal!
> Maintaining only one Python API is helpful for users and contributors.
>
> Best, Hequn
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:41 AM Jark Wu <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 and looking forward to the new Python API world.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 09:22, Becket Qin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 on deprecating the old Python API in 1.9 release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:07 AM Dian Fu <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> +1 for this proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Dian
>
>> 在 2019年6月12日，上午8:24，jincheng sun <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> 写道：
>>
>> big +1 for the proposal.
>>
>> We will soon complete all the Python API functional development of the 1.9
>> release, the development of UDFs will be carried out. After the support of
>> UDFs is completed, it will be very natural to support Datastream API.
>>
>> If all of us agree with this proposal, I believe that for the 1.10 release,
>> it is possible to complete support both UDFs and DataStream API. And we will
>> do our best to make the 1.10 release that contains the Python DataStream API
>> support.
>>
>> So, great thanks to @Stephan for this proposal!
>>
>> Best,
>> Jincheng
>>
>> Zili Chen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 于2019年6月11日周二
>> 下午10:56写道：
>> +1
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> zhijiang <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> 于2019年6月11日周二 下午10:52写道：
>> It is reasonable as stephan explained. +1 from my side!
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> From:Jeff Zhang <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Send Time:2019年6月11日(星期二) 22:11
>> To:Stephan Ewen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Cc:user <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; dev
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate previous Python APIs
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Stephan Ewen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 于2019年6月11日周二
>> 下午9:30写道：
>>
>> > Hi all!
>> >
>> > I would suggest to deprecating the existing python APIs for DataSet and
>> > DataStream API with the 1.9 release.
>> >
>> > Background is that there is a new Python API under development.
>> > The new Python API is initially against the Table API. Flink 1.9 will
>> > support Table API programs without UDFs, 1.10 is planned to support UDFs.
>> > Future versions would support also the DataStream API.
>> >
>> > In the long term, Flink should have one Python API for DataStream and
>> > Table APIs. We should not maintain multiple different implementations and
>> > confuse users that way.
>> > Given that the existing Python APIs are a bit limited and not under active
>> > development, I would suggest to deprecate them in favor of the new API.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Stephan
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Jeff Zhang
>>
>
