+1 (non-binding) Tested in AWS EMR Yarn: 1 master and 4 worker nodes (m5.xlarge: 4 vCore, 16 GiB).
EMR runs only on Java 8. Fine-grained recovery is enabled by default. Modified E2E test scripts can be found here (asserting output): https://github.com/azagrebin/flink/commits/FLINK-13597 Batch SQL: - S3(a) filesystem over HADOOP works out-of-the-box (already on AWS class path) and also if put in plugins Streaming SQL: - Hadoop output (s3 does not support recoverable writers) On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:24 AM Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > HI, > > We just find a serious bug around blink planner: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 > When user reused the table environment instance, and call `execute` method > multiple times for > different sql, the later call will trigger the earlier ones to be > re-executed. > > It's a serious bug but seems we also have a work around, which is never > reuse the table environment > object. I'm not sure if we should treat this one as blocker issue of 1.9.0. > > What's your opinion? > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao <g...@ververica.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Jepsen test suite passed 10 times consecutively > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I did some testing on a Google Cloud Dataproc cluster (it gives you a > > > managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage (GCS)): > > > - tried both YARN session mode and YARN per-job mode, also using > > > bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a YARN session cluster > > > - ran examples that write to GCS, both with the native Hadoop > > FileSystem > > > and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > > > - ran stateful streaming jobs that use GCS as a checkpoint backend > > > - tried running SQL programs on YARN using the SQL Cli: this worked > for > > > YARN session mode but not for YARN per-job mode. Looking at the code I > > > don’t think per-job mode would work from seeing how it is implemented. > > But > > > I think it’s an OK restriction to have for now > > > - in all the testing I had fine-grained recovery (region failover) > > > enabled but I didn’t simulate any failures > > > > > > > On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate. I have verified the > > > following: > > > > > > > > - verified the checksums and GPG files match the corresponding > release > > > files > > > > - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries > > > > - build the source release with Scala 2.11 successfully. > > > > - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 issuses [FLINK-13687] and > > > [FLINK-13688], > > > > but > > > > both are not release blockers. Other than that, all tests are passed. > > > > - ran all e2e tests which don't need download external packages (it's > > > very > > > > unstable > > > > in China and almost impossible to download them), all passed. > > > > - started local cluster, ran some examples. Met a small website > display > > > > issue > > > > [FLINK-13591], which is also not a release blocker. > > > > > > > > Although we have pushed some fixes around blink planner and hive > > > > integration > > > > after RC2, but consider these are both preview features, I'm lean to > be > > > ok > > > > to release > > > > without these fixes. > > > > > > > > +1 from my side. (binding) > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Gordon, > > > >> > > > >> I have verified the following things: > > > >> > > > >> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 > successfully > > > >> - checked/verified signatures and hashes > > > >> - checked that all POM files point to the same version > > > >> - ran some flink table related end-to-end tests locally and > succeeded > > > >> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is reported in FLINK-13704) > > > >> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, > verified > > > web > > > >> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > > >> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to temporal join with kafka > source > > > and > > > >> mysql jdbc table, and write results to kafka again. Using DDL to > > create > > > the > > > >> source and sinks. looks good. > > > >> - reviewed the release PR > > > >> > > > >> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as blocker issue, so +1 from my > side > > > >> (non-binding). > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Richard, > > > >>> > > > >>> although I can see that it would be handy for users who have PubSub > > set > > > >> up, > > > >>> I would rather not include examples which require an external > > > dependency > > > >>> into the Flink distribution. I think examples should be > > self-contained. > > > >> My > > > >>> concern is that we would bloat the distribution for many users at > the > > > >>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think it would be better to make these > > > >>> examples available differently, maybe through Flink's ecosystem > > website > > > >> or > > > >>> maybe a new examples section in Flink's documentation. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Till > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi Till, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> After thinking about we can use VARCHAR as an alternative of > > > >>>> timestamp/time/date. > > > >>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a blocker issue. > > > >>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Jark > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Richard Deurwaarder < > rich...@xeli.eu> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hello all, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar is not included in the examples/ > > dir > > > >>> of > > > >>>>> flink-dist. I've created > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > > >>>>> + https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files to fix this. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I will leave it up to you to decide if we want to add this to > > 1.9.0. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Richard > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Till Rohrmann < > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. Could this be a documented > > > >>> limitation > > > >>>> of > > > >>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think we have agreed that the Blink > SQL > > > >>>>> planner > > > >>>>>> will be rather a preview feature than production ready. Hence it > > > >>> could > > > >>>>>> still contain some bugs. My concern is that there might be still > > > >>> other > > > >>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit by bit and could postpone the > > > >> release > > > >>>>> even > > > >>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are blockers. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs against blink > > > >>>> planner > > > >>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>> rc2. > > > >>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when containing > > > >>>>>> timestamp/date/time > > > >>>>>>> type. > > > >>>>>>> I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull request for > > > >> this. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. Because > > > >>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this will break > the > > > >>> DDL > > > >>>>>>> feature. > > > >>>>>>> However, I want to hear more thoughts from the community > whether > > > >> we > > > >>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>> Jark > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > >>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is > > > >> ok > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> break > > > >>>>>>>>> it across releases (including across bugfix releases?). > > > >>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix > > > >> version > > > >>>> as > > > >>>>>>> 1.9.1. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, > > > >> we > > > >>>>>> usually > > > >>>>>>>>> check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and > > > >>>> correct > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> "Fix > > > >>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version > > > >> (in > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>> case, > > > >>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1). > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should > > > >>>> cancel > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and > > > >>>>> hasn't > > > >>>>>>> been > > > >>>>>>>>>> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>>>> shortlist > > > >>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets > > > >>>>> cancelled. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > >>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So > > > >>>>> technically > > > >>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better > > > >> if > > > >>> we > > > >>>>>> could > > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid > > > >>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > >>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving > > > >>>>>> instead? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > >>>>> becket....@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub > > > >>>> connector > > > >>>>>> API > > > >>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub > > > >>>>> connector > > > >>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> newly > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to > > > >>> include > > > >>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API > > > >> change. > > > >>> I > > > >>>> am > > > >>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do > > > >>>>> others > > > >>>>>>>> think. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen < > > > >>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least > > > >>> we > > > >>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. > > > >> For > > > >>>>> [2] I > > > >>>>>>> can > > > >>>>>>>>>>> see > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a > > > >>>> commit > > > >>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads > > > >>>> would > > > >>>>>>>> contain > > > >>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > >> 下午5:42写道： > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned > > > >>>> were > > > >>>>>>> opened > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> me. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the second issue and a PR was > > > >>>> opened > > > >>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>> it. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> As > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> said > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing problem, should not be > > > >>> blocker > > > >>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it into 1.9 branch. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen < > > > >>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a few hours ago there were > > > >> two > > > >>>> new > > > >>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2]. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked > > > >>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to > > > >>> "Major" > > > >>>>>>>> priority > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to have attention of our > > > >> release > > > >>>>>> manager > > > >>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> least. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > >>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy enough, will try! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen < > > > >>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply build Flink without > > > >>> Hadoop > > > >>>>> and > > > >>>>>>> then > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the recommended way these days. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I also figured out that I > > > >>> need > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> build > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > > >>> project > > > >>>>>>> locally > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop > > > >>>>> version > > > >>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>> want > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid > > > >>>> Wysakowicz > > > >>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dwysakow...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues with mapr maven > > > >>> repository, > > > >>>>> you > > > >>>>>>>> might > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the RC locally with the > > > >>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I do I run into > > > >> dependency > > > >>>>>>> problems > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have worked in the past. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be some documentation > > > >>> somewhere > > > >>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any pointers :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula > > > >>> Fóra > > > >>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following error: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install -DskipTests > > > >>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the > > > >> hadoop > > > >>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on > > > >>> project > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve dependencies for project > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > > >>>>>>> Failed > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact descriptor for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > > > >>>>>>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > > >>>>>>>> ): > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > > >>>>>> PKIX > > > >>>>>>>> path > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid certification path to requested > > > >>>> target > > > >>>>>> -> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a TLS error. Might not > > > >>> be > > > >>>>>>> related > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to know. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li > > > >>>>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>>>>> Tai < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the unresolved > > > >> issues > > > >>>> that > > > >>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA > > > >>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>> notes > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents for new features. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them still associated with > > > >>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>>> since > > > >>>>>>>>>>> these > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the > > > >>>>>> official > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li > > > >>>>>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>>>>> Tai > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache > > > >> Flink > > > >>>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>> now > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the first voting candidate > > > >> for > > > >>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> following > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 and RC1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on release > > > >>>>> candidate > > > >>>>>> #2 > > > >>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release > > > >>>> (please > > > >>>>>>>> provide > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is > > > >> available > > > >>>> for > > > >>>>>>> your > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> review, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release > > > >>> and > > > >>>>>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], > > > >>> which > > > >>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>> signed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to > > > >> the > > > >>>>> Maven > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Central > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag > > > >> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > > >>>> [5]. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also preparing a pull > > > >>> request > > > >>>>> for > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and will update this > > > >> voting > > > >>>>>> thread > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> link > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly afterwards. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for *at least > > > >> 72 > > > >>>>>> hours*. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. > > > >>> 14th > > > >>>>>>> (Wed.) > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by majority approval, with > > > >> at > > > >>>>> least > > > >>>>>> 3 > > > >>>>>>>> PMC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
