Thanks for the comments and fast fixes. @Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> I've quickly looked at the changes to the PubSub connector. Given that it is a API-breaking change and is quite local as a configuration change, I've decided to include that change in RC3. @Jark @Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> I'll be adding FLINK-13699 as well.
Quick update regarding the LICENSE issue with flink-runtime-web: I've doubled checked this and the licenses for the new bundled Javascript dependencies are actually already correctly present under the root licenses-binary/ directory, so we actually don't need additional changes for this. I've started to create RC3 now, will post the vote as soon as it is ready. Cheers, Gordon On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:28 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > Looking at FLINK-13699, it seems to be very local to Table API and HBase > connector. > We can cherry-pick that without re-running distributed tests. > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:46 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I've merged the fix for FLINK-13752. Hence we are good to go to create > the > > new RC. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:30 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I support Jark's fix for FLINK-13699 because it would be disappointing > > > if both DDL and connectors are ready to handle DATE/TIME/TIMESTAMP but > a > > > little component in the middle of the stack is preventing an otherwise > > > usable feature. The changes are minor. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Timo > > > > > > > > > Am 19.08.19 um 13:24 schrieb Jark Wu: > > > > Hi Gordon, > > > > > > > > I agree that we should pick the minimal set of changes to shorten the > > > > release testing time. > > > > However, I would like to include FLINK-13699 into RC3. FLINK-13699 > is a > > > > critical DDL issue, and is a small change to flink table (won't > affect > > > the > > > > runtime feature and stability). > > > > I will do some tests around sql and blink planner if the RC3 include > > this > > > > fix. > > > > > > > > But if the community against to include it, I'm also fine with having > > it > > > in > > > > the next minor release. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 for Gordon's approach. > > > >> > > > >> If we do that, we can probably skip re-testing everything and mainly > > > need > > > >> to verify the release artifacts (signatures, build from source, > etc.). > > > >> > > > >> If we open the RC up for changes, I fear a lot of small issues will > > > rush in > > > >> and destabilize the candidate again, meaning we have to do another > > > larger > > > >> testing effort. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Gordon, > > > >>> > > > >>> I remember we mentioned earlier that if there is an additional RC, > we > > > can > > > >>> piggyback the GCP PubSub API change ( > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13231). It is a small > > > patch > > > >> to > > > >>> avoid future API change. So should be able to merge it very > shortly. > > > >> Would > > > >>> it be possible to include that into RC3 as well? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> > > > >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:43 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Hi, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 turns out to be > > an > > > >>>> actual > > > >>>> blocker, so we would have to close this RC now in favor of a new > > one. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Since we are already quite past the planned release time for > 1.9.0, > > I > > > >>> would > > > >>>> like to limit the new changes included in RC3 to only the > following: > > > >>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 > > > >>>> - Fix license and notice file issues that Kurt had found with > > > >>>> flink-runtime-web and flink-state-processing-api > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This means that I will not be creating RC3 with the release-1.9 > > branch > > > >> as > > > >>>> is, but essentially only cherry-picking the above mentioned > changes > > on > > > >>> top > > > >>>> of RC2. > > > >>>> The minimal set of changes on top of RC2 should allow us to carry > > most > > > >> if > > > >>>> not all of the already existing votes without another round of > > > >> extensive > > > >>>> testing, and allow us to have a shortened voting time. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I understand that there are other issues mentioned in this thread > > that > > > >>> are > > > >>>> already spotted and merged to release-1.9, especially for the > Blink > > > >>> planner > > > >>>> and DDL, but I suggest not to include them in RC3. > > > >>>> I think it would be better to collect all the remaining issues for > > > >> those > > > >>>> over a period of time, and include them as 1.9.1 which can ideally > > > also > > > >>>> happen a few weeks soon after 1.9.0. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> What do you think? If there are not objections, I would proceed > with > > > >> this > > > >>>> plan and push out a new RC by the end of today (Aug. 19th CET). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards, > > > >>>> Gordon > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:09 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>> We should investigate the performance regression but regardless > the > > > >>>>> regression I vote +1 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Have verified following things > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> - Jobs running on YARN x (Session & Per Job) with > high-availability > > > >>>>> enabled. > > > >>>>> - Simulate JM and TM failures. > > > >>>>> - Simulate temporary network partition. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Best, > > > >>>>> tison. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月18日周日 下午10:12写道： > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> For reference, this is the JIRA issue about the regression in > > > >>> question: > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13752 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:57 AM Guowei Ma < > guowei....@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Hi, till > > > >>>>>>> I can send the job to you offline. > > > >>>>>>> It is just a datastream job and does not use > > > >>>>>> TwoInputSelectableStreamTask. > > > >>>>>>> A->B > > > >>>>>>> \ > > > >>>>>>> C > > > >>>>>>> / > > > >>>>>>> D->E > > > >>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>> Guowei > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午4:34写道： > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this issue Guowei. Could you share a bit > > > >>> more > > > >>>>>>> details > > > >>>>>>>> what the job exactly does and which operators it uses? Does > the > > > >>> job > > > >>>>>> uses > > > >>>>>>>> the new `TwoInputSelectableStreamTask` which might cause the > > > >>>>>> performance > > > >>>>>>>> regression? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I think it is important to understand where the problem comes > > > >>> from > > > >>>>>> before > > > >>>>>>>> we proceed with the release. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:27 AM Guowei Ma < > > > >> guowei....@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>> -1 > > > >>>>>>>>> We have a benchmark job, which includes a two-input operator. > > > >>>>>>>>> This job has a big performance regression using 1.9 compared > > > >> to > > > >>>>> 1.8. > > > >>>>>>>>> It's still not very clear why this regression happens. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>> Guowei > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午3:27写道： > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked release notes: OK > > > >>>>>>>>>> - checked sums and signatures: OK > > > >>>>>>>>>> - source release > > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no binaries: OK > > > >>>>>>>>>> - contains no 1.9-SNAPSHOT references: OK > > > >>>>>>>>>> - build from source: OK (8u102) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - mvn clean verify: OK (8u102) > > > >>>>>>>>>> - binary release > > > >>>>>>>>>> - no examples appear to be missing > > > >>>>>>>>>> - started a cluster; WebUI reachable, example ran > > > >>>>> successfully > > > >>>>>>>>>> - repository appears to contain all expected artifacts > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>> Yu > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:06, Bowen Li < > > > >> bowenl...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for letting me know that it's been like this in > > > >>>> previous > > > >>>>>>>>> releases. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Though I don't think that's the right behavior, it can be > > > >>>>>> discussed > > > >>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>> later release. Thus I retract my -1 for RC2. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Bowen > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jark Wu < > > > >> imj...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bowen, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I don't think this is an issue. IMO, it is by > > > >>>>> design. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API and > > > >>>> `show > > > >>>>>>>>>> functions;` > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> SQL CLI are intended to return only the registered > > > >> UDFs, > > > >>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>> including > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> built-in functions. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is also the behavior in previous versions. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 06:52, Bowen Li < > > > >>>> bowenl...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 for RC2. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I found a bug > > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13741, > > > >>>>>>>>>> and I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it's a blocker. The bug means currently if > > > >> users > > > >>>>> call > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> `tEnv.listUserDefinedFunctions()` in Table API or > > > >> `show > > > >>>>>>>> functions;` > > > >>>>>>>>>>> thru > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL would not be able to see Flink's built-in > > > >>> functions. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm preparing a fix right now. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bowen > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:55 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the test efforts, verifications and > > > >>>> votes > > > >>>>> so > > > >>>>>>>> far. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So far, things are looking good, but we still > > > >> require > > > >>>> one > > > >>>>>>> more > > > >>>>>>>>> PMC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote for this RC to be the official release, so I > > > >>> would > > > >>>>>> like > > > >>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>> extend > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote time for 1 more day, until *Aug. 16th 17:00 > > > >>> CET*. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, the release notes for 1.9.0 had > > > >> only > > > >>>>> just > > > >>>>>>> been > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> finalized > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], and could use a few more eyes before closing > > > >> the > > > >>>>> vote. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help with checking if anything else should be > > > >>>>> mentioned > > > >>>>>>>> there > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaking changes / known shortcomings would be > > > >>>>> appreciated. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:58 PM Kurt Young < > > > >>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, then I have no other comments on legal > > > >>> check. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 9:56 PM Chesnay Schepler > > > >> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The licensing items aren't a problem; we don't > > > >>> care > > > >>>>>> about > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> modules > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in NOTICE files, and we don't have to update > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>>>> source-release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> licensing since we don't have a pre-built > > > >> version > > > >>>> of > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> WebUI > > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/08/2019 15:22, Kurt Young wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After going through the licenses, I found 2 > > > >>>>>> suspicions > > > >>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid or not. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. flink-state-processing-api is packaged in > > > >> to > > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist > > > >>>>>>>>>> jar, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE-binary file (the one under the root > > > >>>>> directory) > > > >>>>>>>> like > > > >>>>>>>>>>> other > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modules. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. flink-runtime-web distributed some > > > >>> JavaScript > > > >>>>>>>>> dependencies > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> through > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codes, the licenses and NOTICE file were only > > > >>>>> updated > > > >>>>>>>>> inside > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> module > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-runtime-web, but not the NOTICE file > > > >> and > > > >>>>>> licenses > > > >>>>>>>>>>> directory > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the root directory. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another minor issue I just found is: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13558 tries to include table examples > > > >> to > > > >>>>>>>> flink-dist, > > > >>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the binary distribution of RC2. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM Kurt Young < > > > >>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon & Timo, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, and I agree with > > > >> it. > > > >>> I > > > >>>>> will > > > >>>>>>>>>> document > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tzu-Li > > > >>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>> Tai > > > >>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the same argument as before, given > > > >> that > > > >>> it > > > >>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement that it is a preview feature, > > > >> I > > > >>>>> would > > > >>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>> block > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of it. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, it would be important to > > > >>> mention > > > >>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>> explicitly > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release notes [1]. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9438 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:29 AM Timo > > > >>> Walther < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> twal...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that this is a serious bug. > > > >>> However, I > > > >>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>> block > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release because of this. As you said, > > > >> there > > > >>>> is a > > > >>>>>>>>>> workaround > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute()` works in the most common case > > > >>> of a > > > >>>>>>> single > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> execution. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix this in a minor release shortly after. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do others think? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 15.08.19 um 11:23 schrieb Kurt Young: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HI, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We just find a serious bug around blink > > > >>>>> planner: > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When user reused the table environment > > > >>>>> instance, > > > >>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> call > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> `execute` > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple times for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different sql, the later call will > > > >> trigger > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> earlier > > > >>>>>>>>>> ones > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-executed. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a serious bug but seems we also > > > >> have a > > > >>>>> work > > > >>>>>>>>> around, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reuse the table environment > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object. I'm not sure if we should treat > > > >>> this > > > >>>>> one > > > >>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>> blocker > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's your opinion? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gary Yao > > > >> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>> g...@ververica.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jepsen test suite passed 10 times > > > >>>>> consecutively > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha > > > >>>>>> Krettek < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some testing on a Google Cloud > > > >>>> Dataproc > > > >>>>>>>> cluster > > > >>>>>>>>>> (it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gives > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage > > > >>>> (GCS)): > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried both YARN session mode and > > > >>> YARN > > > >>>>>>> per-job > > > >>>>>>>>>> mode, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> also > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a > > > >> YARN > > > >>>>>> session > > > >>>>>>>>>> cluster > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran examples that write to GCS, > > > >>> both > > > >>>>> with > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> native > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FileSystem > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran stateful streaming jobs that > > > >>> use > > > >>>>> GCS > > > >>>>>>> as a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> checkpoint > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backend > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - tried running SQL programs on > > > >> YARN > > > >>>>> using > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> SQL > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cli: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YARN session mode but not for YARN > > > >>> per-job > > > >>>>>> mode. > > > >>>>>>>>>> Looking > > > >>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t think per-job mode would work > > > >> from > > > >>>>> seeing > > > >>>>>>> how > > > >>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implemented. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it’s an OK restriction to have > > > >>> for > > > >>>>> now > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - in all the testing I had > > > >>> fine-grained > > > >>>>>>>> recovery > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (region > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failover) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled but I didn’t simulate any > > > >>> failures > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young > > > >> < > > > >>>>>>>>>> ykt...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for preparing this release > > > >>>>> candidate. I > > > >>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> verified > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified the checksums and GPG files > > > >>>> match > > > >>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - verified that the source archives do > > > >>> not > > > >>>>>>>> contains > > > >>>>>>>>>> any > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala > > > >>> 2.11 > > > >>>>>>>>>> successfully. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 > > > >>> issuses > > > >>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13687] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13688], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both are not release blockers. Other > > > >>> than > > > >>>>>> that, > > > >>>>>>>> all > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tests > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran all e2e tests which don't need > > > >>>>> download > > > >>>>>>>>> external > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (it's > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unstable > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in China and almost impossible to > > > >>> download > > > >>>>>>> them), > > > >>>>>>>>> all > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> passed. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started local cluster, ran some > > > >>>> examples. > > > >>>>>> Met > > > >>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>> small > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> display > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-13591], which is also not a > > > >>> release > > > >>>>>>>> blocker. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although we have pushed some fixes > > > >>> around > > > >>>>>> blink > > > >>>>>>>>>> planner > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hive > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after RC2, but consider these are both > > > >>>>> preview > > > >>>>>>>>>> features, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lean > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without these fixes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from my side. (binding) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark > > > >> Wu > > > >>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the following things: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - build the source release with Scala > > > >>>> 2.12 > > > >>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> Scala > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked/verified signatures and > > > >>> hashes > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - checked that all POM files point to > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>> same > > > >>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - ran some flink table related > > > >>> end-to-end > > > >>>>>> tests > > > >>>>>>>>>> locally > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> succeeded > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is > > > >>>> reported > > > >>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13704) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 > > > >>> and > > > >>>>>> 2.12, > > > >>>>>>>> ran > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> examples, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verified > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to > > > >>>>>> temporal > > > >>>>>>>> join > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> kafka > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mysql jdbc table, and write results > > > >> to > > > >>>>> kafka > > > >>>>>>>> again. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Using > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source and sinks. looks good. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - reviewed the release PR > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as > > > >>>> blocker > > > >>>>>>>> issue, > > > >>>>>>>>> so > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> side > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (non-binding). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till > > > >>>>> Rohrmann < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Richard, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> although I can see that it would be > > > >>>> handy > > > >>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> users > > > >>>>>>>>>>> who > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would rather not include examples > > > >>>> which > > > >>>>>>>> require > > > >>>>>>>>> an > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> external > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the Flink distribution. I think > > > >>>>>> examples > > > >>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contained. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern is that we would bloat the > > > >>>>>>> distribution > > > >>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>> many > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> users > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think > > > >> it > > > >>>>> would > > > >>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>> better > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples available differently, > > > >> maybe > > > >>>>>> through > > > >>>>>>>>>> Flink's > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ecosystem > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a new examples section in > > > >>> Flink's > > > >>>>>>>>>> documentation. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark > > > >>> Wu > > > >>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After thinking about we can use > > > >>> VARCHAR > > > >>>>> as > > > >>>>>> an > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/time/date. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a > > > >>>>> blocker > > > >>>>>>>>> issue. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, > > > >> Richard > > > >>>>>>>>> Deurwaarder < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich...@xeli.eu > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar > > > >> is > > > >>>> not > > > >>>>>>>> included > > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dir > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-dist. I've created > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will leave it up to you to > > > >> decide > > > >>> if > > > >>>>> we > > > >>>>>>> want > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>> add > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM > > > >> Till > > > >>>>>>> Rohrmann > > > >>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jark, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. > > > >>>> Could > > > >>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitation > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think > > > >> we > > > >>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>> agreed > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blink > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be rather a preview feature > > > >>> than > > > >>>>>>>>> production > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hence > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still contain some bugs. My > > > >> concern > > > >>>> is > > > >>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>> there > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> might > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit > > > >> by > > > >>>> bit > > > >>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> postpone > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are > > > >>>>>> blockers. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM > > > >>> Jark > > > >>>>> Wu < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just find an issue when > > > >> testing > > > >>>>>>> connector > > > >>>>>>>>> DDLs > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> against > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rc2. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL > > > >> doesn't > > > >>>>> work > > > >>>>>>> when > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> containing > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created an issue > > > >>>> FLINK-13699[1] > > > >>>>>>> and a > > > >>>>>>>>>> pull > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue > > > >>> of > > > >>>>> 1.9 > > > >>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Because > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are > > > >> primitive > > > >>>>> types, > > > >>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> will > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DDL > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I want to hear more > > > >>>> thoughts > > > >>>>>> from > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> community > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, > > > >>> Becket > > > >>>>>> Qin < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM > > > >>>>> Tzu-Li > > > >>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is a > > > >> @PublicEvolving > > > >>>>>>> interface, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it across releases (including > > > >>>> across > > > >>>>>>>> bugfix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases?). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it > > > >>>> now, > > > >>>>>>> please > > > >>>>>>>>>> mark > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>> case a > > > >>>>>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check the list of changes > > > >>> compared > > > >>>>> to > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> previous > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding > > > >>>> JIRAs > > > >>>>> to > > > >>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> right > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 > > > >>>>> instead > > > >>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.1). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 > > > >> PM > > > >>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>> Rohrmann > > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be > > > >> nicer. > > > >>>> Not > > > >>>>>>> sure > > > >>>>>>>>>>> whether > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it > > > >> is > > > >>>>> open > > > >>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>> quite > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> some > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hasn't > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addressed until very > > > >> recently. > > > >>>>> Maybe > > > >>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>> could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortlist > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we > > > >>> do > > > >>>> in > > > >>>>>>> case > > > >>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 > > > >> PM > > > >>>>>> Becket > > > >>>>>>>> Qin > > > >>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already > > > >>>>>>> documented > > > >>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> way. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technically > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to > > > >> change > > > >>> it > > > >>>>>>> later. > > > >>>>>>>> It > > > >>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> just > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 > > > >>> PM > > > >>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>> Rohrmann > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the > > > >> PubSub > > > >>>>>>> connector > > > >>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> public > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evolving > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > > >> 3:18 > > > >>> PM > > > >>>>>>> Becket > > > >>>>>>>>> Qin > > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becket....@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) > > > >>> has a > > > >>>>>> minor > > > >>>>>>>>>> Google > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config > > > >> rate > > > >>>>>>> limiting. > > > >>>>>>>>> The > > > >>>>>>>>>>> GCP > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PubSub > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newly > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in > > > >> 1.9, > > > >>>> so > > > >>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nice > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later > > > >>> to > > > >>>>>> avoid > > > >>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>> public > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker > > > >> for > > > >>>>> 1.9. > > > >>>>>>> Want > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> check > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > > >> 2:04 > > > >>>> PM > > > >>>>>> Zili > > > >>>>>>>>> Chen > > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your > > > >>> explanation. > > > >>>>> For > > > >>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>> think > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, > > > >> like > > > >>>>> unset > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> fixed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test > > > >>>> scope > > > >>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>> wonder > > > >>>>>>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> such > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. > > > >> IIRC > > > >>>>>>> previous > > > >>>>>>>> RC > > > >>>>>>>>>>> VOTE > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threads > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I > > > >>> will > > > >>>>> try > > > >>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>> look > > > >>>>>>>>>> up > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young < > > > >>> ykt...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:42写道： > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. > > > >>>> The 2 > > > >>>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>> you > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the > > > >>>> second > > > >>>>>>> issue > > > >>>>>>>>>> and a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PR > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opened > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing > > > >>>>>> problem, > > > >>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it > > > >>> into > > > >>>>> 1.9 > > > >>>>>>>>> branch. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at > > > >>> 5:38 > > > >>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>> Zili > > > >>>>>>>>>> Chen > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a > > > >> few > > > >>>>> hours > > > >>>>>>> ago > > > >>>>>>>>>> there > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> were > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as > > > >>>> blockers > > > >>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0[1][2]. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as > > > >>>>>> duplication > > > >>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, > > > >> while > > > >>>> [2] > > > >>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>> downgrade > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Major" > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be > > > >>>> fixed > > > >>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>> 1.9.0. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to > > > >> have > > > >>>>>>> attention > > > >>>>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>>>> our > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra < > > > >>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy > > > >> enough, > > > >>>> will > > > >>>>>>> try! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > > >> at > > > >>>>> 11:00 > > > >>>>>> AM > > > >>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ewen > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting > > > >>>> this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply > > > >>>> build > > > >>>>>>> Flink > > > >>>>>>>>>>> without > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to > > > >>> your > > > >>>>>>> CloudEra > > > >>>>>>>>>> libs? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the > > > >> recommended > > > >>>> way > > > >>>>>>> these > > > >>>>>>>>>> days. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > > >> at > > > >>>>> 10:48 > > > >>>>>>> AM > > > >>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I > > > >> also > > > >>>>>> figured > > > >>>>>>>> out > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set > > > >>> to > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> specific > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 > > > >>> at > > > >>>>> 9:54 > > > >>>>>>> AM > > > >>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wysakowicz > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >> dwysakow...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues > > > >>> with > > > >>>>> mapr > > > >>>>>>>> maven > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the > > > >>>>>>>> "unsafe-mapr-repo" > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> profile. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 > > > >> 19:31, > > > >>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>> Fóra > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the > > > >>> RC > > > >>>>>>> locally > > > >>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I > > > >> do > > > >>> I > > > >>>>> run > > > >>>>>>> into > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have > > > >>>>> worked > > > >>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> past. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be > > > >> some > > > >>>>>>>>> documentation > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any > > > >>>> pointers > > > >>>>> :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, > > > >> 2019 > > > >>>> at > > > >>>>>> 6:57 > > > >>>>>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fóra > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to > > > >>> build > > > >>>>>>>> 1.9.0-rc2 > > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following > > > >>>>> error: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install > > > >>>>>>> -DskipTests > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop > > > >>>>> (ignore > > > >>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to > > > >>>>> execute > > > >>>>>>>> goal > > > >>>>>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve > > > >>> dependencies > > > >>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> project > > > >>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > > >> descriptor > > > >>>> for > > > >> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > > > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > > > >>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ): > > > >>>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PKIX > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > > > >>>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid > > > >> certification > > > >>>>> path > > > >>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>> requested > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> target > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a > > > >>> TLS > > > >>>>>>> error. > > > >>>>>>>>>> Might > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to > > > >>>> know. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, > > > >> 2019 > > > >>>> at > > > >>>>>> 6:26 > > > >>>>>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> unresolved > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", > > > >>> as > > > >>>>> seen > > > >>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> JIRA > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notes > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents > > > >>> for > > > >>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>> features. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them > > > >>> still > > > >>>>>>>>> associated > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for > > > >> 1.9.0 > > > >>>> soon > > > >>>>>>> along > > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, > > > >>> 2019 > > > >>>> at > > > >>>>>>> 6:17 > > > >>>>>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tzu-Li > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tai > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >> tzuli...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release > > > >> candidate > > > >>>> #2 > > > >>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> Apache > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the > > > >> first > > > >>>>>> voting > > > >>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 > > > >>> and > > > >>>>> RC1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review > > > >> and > > > >>>>> vote > > > >>>>>> on > > > >>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not > > > >>>>> approve > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (please > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete > > > >>>> staging > > > >>>>>> area > > > >>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release > > > >>>> notes > > > >>>>>> [1], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official > > > >>>> Apache > > > >>>>>>>> source > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to > > > >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org > > > >>>>>>>>>> [2], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > > > >>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts > > > >>> to > > > >>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>> deployed > > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Central > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code > > > >> tag > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also > > > >>>>>> preparing > > > >>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>> pull > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and > > > >>> will > > > >>>>>>> update > > > >>>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> link > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly > > > >>>>>>> afterwards. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will > > > >> be > > > >>>> open > > > >>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>> *at > > > >>>>>>>>>>> least > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 72 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours*. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast > > > >> your > > > >>>>> votes > > > >>>>>>>> before > > > >>>>>>>>>>> *Aug. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14th > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Wed.) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by > > > >>> majority > > > >>>>>>>> approval, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > >>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > >
