Hi all,

Thanks all for so much feedbacks received in the doc so far.
I saw a general agreement on using computed column to support proctime
attribute and extract timestamps.
So we will prepare a computed column FLIP and share in the dev ML soon.

Feel free to leave more comments!

Best,
Jark



On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 13:50, Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jark,
>
> Thanks for bringing up this discussion and the detailed design doc. This
> is definitely a critical feature for streaming SQL jobs. I have left a few
> comments in the design doc.
>
> Thanks,
> Dian
>
> > 在 2019年9月6日,上午11:48,Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > Thanks Jark for this topic, This will be very useful.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > ForwardXu
> >
> > Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> 于2019年9月6日周五 上午11:26写道:
> >
> >> Thanks Jark for bring up this topic, this is definitely an import
> feature
> >> for the SQL, especially the DDL users.
> >>
> >> I would spend some time to review this design doc, really thanks.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Danny Chan
> >> 在 2019年9月6日 +0800 AM11:19,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>,写道:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to start discussion about how to support time attribute in
> >> SQL
> >>> DDL.
> >>> In Flink 1.9, we already introduced a basic SQL DDL to create a table.
> >>> However, it doesn't support to define time attributes. This makes users
> >>> can't
> >>> apply window operations on the tables created by DDL which is a bad
> >>> experience.
> >>>
> >>> In FLIP-66, we propose a syntax for watermark to define rowtime
> attribute
> >>> and propose to use computed column syntax to define proctime attribute.
> >>> But computed column is another big topic and should deserve a separate
> >>> FLIP.
> >>> If we have a consensus on the computed column approach, we will start
> >>> computed column FLIP soon.
> >>>
> >>> FLIP-66:
> >>>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-SecocBqzUh7zY6HBYcfMlG_0z-JAcuZkCvsmN3LrOw/edit#
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for any feedback!
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Jark
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to