+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions @Jark -- Rong
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 non-binding > (nit: Add a road map?) > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) > > +1 > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed and > > reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it after > > Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. > > > > Thanks, > > Jark > > > > [1]: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL > > [2]: > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html > > >
