+1 from my side. Best, Jark
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 09:33, Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oops.. Sorry for the confusion. I thought only PMC votes are binding. > Thanks for the clarification @Timo :-D > > -- > Rong > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:12 AM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 for the syntax and their semantics > > > > I think the implementation part is still a bit unclear to me because it > > only ensures the current status but still does not solve future > > requirements such as per-partition watermarks that need to be pushed > > into a connector such as Kafka. We can also discuss that as part of the > > computed column FLIP. > > > > @Rong: Why do you think you vote is not binding? Committer votes are > > binding :-) > > > > Thanks, > > Timo > > > > On 29.09.19 02:17, Rong Rong wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the effort and leading the discussions > @Jark > > > > > > -- > > > Rong > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:36 PM JingsongLee <lzljs3620...@aliyun.com > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 non-binding > > >> (nit: Add a road map?) > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Jingsong Lee > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> From:Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> > > >> Send Time:2019年9月26日(星期四) 20:44 > > >> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-66: Support Time Attribute in SQL DDL (#2) > > >> > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Kurt > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-66 [1], which is discussed > and > > >>> reached a consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > >>> > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it > after > > >>> Oct. 01 08:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Jark > > >>> > > >>> [1]: > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-66%3A+Support+time+attribute+in+SQL+DDL > > >>> [2]: > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-66-Support-time-attribute-in-SQL-DDL-tt32766.html > > > > > > >
