+1 (non-binding)
    Very thanks for bringing this to the community!

------------------------------------------------------------------
From:jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
Send Time:2019 Oct. 31 (Thu.) 10:22
To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
Cc:Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink

big +1 (binding)

Andrey Zagrebin <azagre...@apache.org>于2019年10月30日 周三23:45写道:

> sorry, my +1 was non-binding, confused that it was not a committer vote but
> PMC.
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:43 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 30/10/2019 15:25, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
> > > +1 (binding) from me. I hope this is not too late :)
> > >
> > > Thank you for this great contribution!
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 14:45, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you all for voting.
> > >>
> > >> The voting period has passed, but only 13 PMC members have voted so
> far,
> > >> that is less than 2/3rd of the PMCs (17 members).
> > >>
> > >> I will take a few days to ping other members to vote, after that we
> will
> > >> gradually lower the threshold as per the process to account for
> inactive
> > >> members.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Stephan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:20 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> Seth
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Oct 23, 2019, at 9:31 PM, Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>> Jingsong Lee
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:02 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 16:56, Haibo Sun <sunhaib...@163.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)Best,
> > >>>>>> Haibo
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> At 2019-10-23 09:07:41, "Becket Qin" <becket....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:44 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > >>>>> tzuli...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Gordon
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 10:58 PM Zhijiang <
> > >> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > >>>>>>>> .invalid>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>> From:Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> Send Time:2019 Oct. 22 (Tue.) 16:33
> > >>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept Stateful Functions into Apache Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>> Zhu Zhu
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月22日周二 上午11:06写道:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 10:26, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:38, Hequn Cheng <
> > chenghe...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Hequn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 AM Dian Fu <
> > >>>>> dian0511...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 在 2019年10月22日,上午9:10,Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:56 AM Fabian Hueske <
> > >>>>>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 16:18 Uhr schrieb Thomas Weise <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> t...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:10 AM Timo Walther <
> > >>>>>>>>> twal...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > >>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the official vote whether to accept the
> > >>>>>> Stateful
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribution to Apache Flink.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current Stateful Functions code, documentation,
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> website
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found here:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://statefun.io/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink
> > >>>>>>>> community
> > >>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful
> > >>>>>>>> Functions.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that
> > >>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>> project
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to
> > >>>>> grow
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new set of use cases. We see current users
> > >>>>> interested
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>> such
> > >>>>>>>>>>> use
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they are not well supported by Flink as it
> > >>>>>> currently
> > >>>>>>>>> is.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also personally commit to put time into making
> > >>>>> sure
> > >>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrates
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Flink and that we grow contributors and
> > >>>>>> committers
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> maintain
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new component well.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> bylaws
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at
> > >>>>>>>> least
> > >>>>>>>>> 6
> > >>>>>>>>>>> days
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th
> > >>>>>>>> 12:00
> > >>>>>>>>>> UTC,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achieve the 2/3rd majority.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy voting!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to