+1 This gives a better overview of the deployment targets and shows our prospective users that they can rely on a broad set of vendors, if help is needed.
I guess, Robert means if the vendor offers a managed service (like AWS Kinesis Analytics), or licenses software (like Ververica Platform). This would be beneficial, but on the other hand the categories/terms (managed, hosted, "serverless", self-managed) are not so well-defined in my experience. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote: > Happy to see there seems to be a consensus. > > Robert, can you elaborate on what you mean by "deployment model"? > > Seth > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:19 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 to the general idea > > > > Maybe we could add "Deployment Model" in addition to "Supported > > Environments" as properties for the vendors. > > I'd say Cloudera, Eventador and Huawei [1] are missing from this page > > > > [1]https://www.huaweicloud.com/en-us/product/cs.html > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:05 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 for your proposed solution, Seth! > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for continuing this discussion Seth. I like the mockup and I > > think > > > > this is a good improvement. Modulo the completeness check, +1 for > > > offering > > > > links to 3rd party integrations. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This discussion is a follow up to the previous thread on dropping > > > > > vendor-specific documentation[1]. > > > > > > > > > > The conversation ended unresolved on the question of what we should > > > > provide > > > > > on the Apache Flink docs. The consensus seemed to be moving towards > > > > > offering a table with links to 3rd parties. After an offline > > > conversation > > > > > with Robert, I have drafted a mock-up of what that might look > > like[2]. > > > > > Please note that I included a few vendors that I could think of off > > the > > > > top > > > > > of my head, the list in this picture is not complete but that is > not > > > the > > > > > conversation we are having here. > > > > > > > > > > There are three competing goals that we are trying to achieve here. > > > > > > > > > > 1) Provide information to users that vendor support is available as > > it > > > > can > > > > > be important in growing adoption within enterprises > > > > > 2) Be maintainable by the open-source Flink community > > > > > 3) Remain neutral > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know what you think > > > > > > > > > > Seth > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-vendor-specific-deployment-documentation-td35457.html > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/sjwiesman/bb90f0765148c15051bcc91092367851/raw/42c0a1e9240f1c5808a053f8ff5965828cca96d5/mockup.png > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect +49 160 91394525 Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/> -- Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink Conference Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time -- Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany -- Ververica GmbH Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji (Tony) Cheng
