I was actually referring to "YARN", "Kubernetes", "Mesos".
If people know that AWS EMR is using YARN, they know which documentation to
look for in Flink.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:26 PM Konstantin Knauf <konstan...@ververica.com>
wrote:

> +1 This gives a better overview of the deployment targets and shows our
> prospective users that they can rely on a broad set of vendors, if help is
> needed.
>
> I guess, Robert means if the vendor offers a managed service (like AWS
> Kinesis Analytics), or licenses software (like Ververica Platform). This
> would be beneficial, but on the other hand the categories/terms (managed,
> hosted, "serverless", self-managed) are not so well-defined in my
> experience.
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:46 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Happy to see there seems to be a consensus.
> >
> > Robert, can you elaborate on what you mean by "deployment model"?
> >
> > Seth
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:19 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to the general idea
> > >
> > > Maybe we could add "Deployment Model" in addition to "Supported
> > > Environments" as properties for the vendors.
> > > I'd say Cloudera, Eventador and Huawei [1] are missing from this page
> > >
> > > [1]https://www.huaweicloud.com/en-us/product/cs.html
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:05 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for your proposed solution, Seth!
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:05 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for continuing this discussion Seth. I like the mockup and I
> > > think
> > > > > this is a good improvement. Modulo the completeness check, +1 for
> > > > offering
> > > > > links to 3rd party integrations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Till
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This discussion is a follow up to the previous thread on dropping
> > > > > > vendor-specific documentation[1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The conversation ended unresolved on the question of what we
> should
> > > > > provide
> > > > > > on the Apache Flink docs. The consensus seemed to be moving
> towards
> > > > > > offering a table with links to 3rd parties. After an offline
> > > > conversation
> > > > > > with Robert, I have drafted a mock-up of what that might look
> > > like[2].
> > > > > > Please note that I included a few vendors that I could think of
> off
> > > the
> > > > > top
> > > > > > of my head, the list in this picture is not complete but that is
> > not
> > > > the
> > > > > > conversation we are having here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are three competing goals that we are trying to achieve
> here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) Provide information to users that vendor support is available
> as
> > > it
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be important in growing adoption within enterprises
> > > > > > 2) Be maintainable by the open-source Flink community
> > > > > > 3) Remain neutral
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know what you think
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Seth
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-vendor-specific-deployment-documentation-td35457.html
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/sjwiesman/bb90f0765148c15051bcc91092367851/raw/42c0a1e9240f1c5808a053f8ff5965828cca96d5/mockup.png
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect
>
> +49 160 91394525
>
>
> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
>
>
> --
>
> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> Conference
>
> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>
> --
>
> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
>
> --
> Ververica GmbH
> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
> (Tony) Cheng
>

Reply via email to