Hi Danny,
Thank you very much.

Best,
Forward

Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> 于2020年1月10日周五 上午11:08写道:

> Thanks Forward ~
> +1 from my side and would review your Calcite PR this weekend :) Overall
> it looks good, and I believe we can merge it soon ~
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2020年1月10日 +0800 AM11:04,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>,写道:
> > Thanks Forward for driving this,
> >
> > The design doc looks very good to me.
> > +1 from my side.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 20:12, Forward Xu <forwardxu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Listened to the opinion of Timo since the last discussion and updated
> the
> > > document [1] Optimized the passing parameters of JSON table API. Added
> > > return type when describing each JSON function. It makes the
> documentation
> > > more clear. So I again vote of FLIP-90 [2] since that we have reached
> an
> > > agreement on the design in the discussion thread [3].
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an
> objection,
> > > I will try to close it by January 12, 2020 08:00 UTC if we have
> received
> > > sufficient votes.
> > > Best,
> > > ForwardXu
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JfaFYIFOAY8P2pFhOYNCQ9RTzwF4l85_bnTvImOLKMk/edit#heading=h.76mb88ca6yjp
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=141724550
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-JSON-functions-in-Flink-SQL-td32674.html
> > >
>

Reply via email to