+1 for a quick bug fix release for 1.11

Best,
Congxian


Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月10日周五 上午9:37写道:

> +1, thanks Jark for bringing this up and Dian for volunteering as our
> release manager.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 09:29, Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for a quick bug fix release and Dian as the release manager.
> >
> > Best,
> > Hequn
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:22 PM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jark,
> > >
> > > Thanks for offering the help. It would definitely be helpful.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dian
> > >
> > > > 在 2020年7月9日,下午8:54,Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > +1 for a quick bug fix release for 1.11
> > > >
> > > > Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2020年7月9日周四 下午8:11写道:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd also be in favour of releasing a 1.11.1 quickly
> > > >>
> > > >> Aljoscha
> > > >>
> > > >> On 09.07.20 13:57, Jark Wu wrote:
> > > >>> Hi Dian,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Glad to hear that you want to be the release manager of Flink
> 1.11.1.
> > > >>> I am very willing to help you with the final steps of the release
> > > >> process.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Jark
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 17:57, Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> FLINK-18461 is really a blocker for the CDC feature.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> So +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.1 soon.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Best,
> > > >>>> Jingsong
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:34 PM jincheng sun <
> > sunjincheng...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks for bring up this discussion Jark.
> > > >>>>> +1, looking forward the first bugfix version of Flink 1.11.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Jincheng
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月9日周四 下午5:28写道:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks Jark for bringing up this discussion. I also noticed that
> > > there
> > > >>>>> are
> > > >>>>>> already users trying out the CDC feature and so it makes sense
> to
> > > >> have a
> > > >>>>>> quick 1.11.1 release.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I would volunteer as the release manager of 1.11.1 if we finally
> > > >> decide
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>> have a quick release. Also +1 to create the first RC on next
> > Monday.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Dian
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> 在 2020年7月9日,下午3:55,Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org>
> 写道:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I do agree it would be beneficial to have the 1.11.1 rather
> soon.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Personally additionally to Jark's list I'd like to see:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> FLINK-18419  Can not create a catalog from user jar
> > > >>>>>>> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18419)
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> incluedd. It has a PR already.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Dawid
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 09/07/2020 09:51, Leonard Xu wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> Hi, Jark
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks fro bringing this discussion.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We canceled the blocker priority of FLINK-18461 when release
> > Flink
> > > >>>>>> 1.11.0 from time consideration, IIRC, the majority of us agreed
> to
> > > >> have
> > > >>>>> a
> > > >>>>>> timely 1.11.1 in the vote mail of Flink 1.11.0.
> > > >>>>>>>> And I have noticed some user voice[1][2] that they’re using
> CDC
> > > >>>>> feature
> > > >>>>>> in mail list and offline communication with community user, I
> > think
> > > >> the
> > > >>>>>> following notable issues should be included in 1.11.1:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-18461 Changelog source can't be insert into upsert
> sink
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-18426 Incompatible deprecated key type for
> registration
> > > >>>>> cluster
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-18434 Can not select fields with JdbcCatalog
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-17726 Scheduler should take care of tasks directly
> > > canceled
> > > >>>>> by
> > > >>>>>> TaskManager
> > > >>>>>>>> - FLINK-17075 Add task status reconciliation between TM and JM
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> So,  +1 to prepare a quick bug-fix version from my side.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>> Leonard Xu
> > > >>>>>>>> [1] user:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flip-105-can-the-debezium-canal-SQL-sink-to-database-directly-td36275.html#a36306
> > > >>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flip-105-can-the-debezium-canal-SQL-sink-to-database-directly-td36275.html#a36306
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [2] user-zh:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/flink-1-11-cdc-flink-sql-kafka-topic-tt4567.html#a4590
> > > >>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink.147419.n8.nabble.com/flink-1-11-cdc-flink-sql-kafka-topic-tt4567.html#a4590
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 在 2020年7月9日,11:12,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Besides, it would be great if we can figure out the
> performance
> > > >>>>>> regression
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thomas reported before.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Do you know what's the status now? @zhijiang <
> > > >>>>>> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>> @Thomas
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 11:10, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> As discussed in the voting thread of 1.11.0-RC4 [1], we
> found
> > a
> > > >>>>>> blocker
> > > >>>>>>>>>> issue about the CDC feature [1].
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Considering this is a new kind of connector, we don't want
> to
> > > >> block
> > > >>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> ready-to-publish RC4 and prefer to have an immediately
> 1.11.1
> > > >>>>> release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I would like to start the discussion about
> > releasing
> > > >>>>> 1.11.1
> > > >>>>>>>>>> soon, to deliver a complete CDC feature.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> We can also release some notable bug fixes found in these
> > days.
> > > >>>>> But I
> > > >>>>>>>>>> suggest not to wait too long to collect/fix bugs,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> otherwise it will delay the feature delivery again, we can
> > > launch
> > > >>>>>> another
> > > >>>>>>>>>> patch release after that if needed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Most notable bug fixes so far are:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18461 Changelog source can't be insert into upsert
> > sink
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18426 Incompatible deprecated key type for
> > registration
> > > >>>>>> cluster
> > > >>>>>>>>>> options
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think it would be better if we can fix these
> > > issues
> > > >>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18434 Can not select fields with JdbcCatalog (PR
> > opened)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18520 New Table Function type inference fails (PR
> > > opened)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-18477 ChangelogSocketExample does not work
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to suggest creating the first RC next Monday. What
> do
> > > you
> > > >>>>>> think?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> If there are any concerns or missing blocker issues need to
> be
> > > >>>>> fixed
> > > >>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.11.1, please let me know. Thanks.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-1-11-0-release-candidate-4-tp42829p42858.html
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18461
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Benchao Li
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to