Hi Xintong, thanks for starting the vote.
+1 for the proposal given that we find a proper name for the different memory consumers (specifically the batch/RocksDB consumer) and their corresponding weights. Cheers, Till On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi devs, > > I'd like to start a voting thread on FLIP-141[1], which proposes how > managed memory should be shared by various use cases within a slot. The > proposal has been discussed in [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72h + weekends. I'll try to close it on > September 8, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-141%3A+Intra-Slot+Managed+Memory+Sharing#FLIP141:IntraSlotManagedMemorySharing-compatibility > > [2] > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-141-Intra-Slot-Managed-Memory-Sharing-td44146.html >
