+1 to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x.

If possible, that would be great. Many people are looking forward to the
FLIP-27 interface, but they don't want to take the risk to upgrade to 1.12
(And wait 1.12). After all, 1.11 is a relatively stable version.

Best,
Jingsong

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:24 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for starting this.
>
> +1 form my side to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x.
>
> There were quite a few changes, and I think we need to cherry-pick them all
> to not get some inconsistent mix of changes and many merge conflicts.
> I made a list below of what we need to add to "release-1.11".
>
> *#### Core Source API Changes to backport (in REVERSE order)*
>
>   (Use: "git log
> flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/connector/source")
>
> commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
> [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API and Split
> Reader API
>
> commit 428fbbad85379f71a9fbf1a1ab3e3dcfa9006436
> [FLINK-19205][core] Add access to configuration and hostname in the
> SourceReaderContext
>
> commit 723e1790744ddc78d19c7c978442af1383f38d33
> [hotfix][core] Add to Source Enumerator convenience methods to assign
> single split
>
> *#### Connector Base Changes to Backport (in REVERSE order)*
>
>   (Use: "git log flink-connectors/flink-connector-base")
>
> commit 401f56fe9d6b0271260edf9787cdcbfe4d03874d
> [FLINK-19427][FLINK-19489][tests] Fix test conditions for
> 'SplitFetcherTest.testNotifiesWhenGoingIdleConcurrent()'
>
> commit 68c5c2ff779d82a1ff81ffaf60d8a1b283797db1
> [FLINK-19448][connector base] Explicitly check for un-expected condition
> that would leave an inconsistent state
>
> commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
> [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API and Split
> Reader API
>
> commit c1ca7a4c7c21ec8868c14cdddd43c559625b794c
> [refactor][tests] Move some source test utils from flink-connector-base to
> flink-core
>
> commit ee5c4c211c35c70d28252363bbc8400453609977
> [FLINK-19251][connectors] Avoid confusing queue handling in
> "SplitReader.handleSplitsChanges()"
>
> commit 5abef56b2bf85bcac786f6b16b6899b6cced7176
> [FLINK-19250][connectors] Fix error propagation in connector base
> (SplitFetcherManager).
>
> commit 8fcca837c55a9216595ee4c03038b52747098dbb
> [hotfix][connectors] Improve JavaDocs for SingleThreadFetcherManager
>
> commit 4700bb5dde3303cbe98882f6beb7379425717b01
> [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to SourceReaderBase
> (part 2)
>
> commit 12261c6b7ed6478a9b9f6a69cb58246b83cab9b7
> [FLINK-17393][connectors] (follow-up) Wakeup the SplitFetchers more
> elegantly.
>
> commit c60aaff0249bfd6b5871b7f82e03efc487a54d6b
> [hotfix][tests] Extend test coverage for FutureCompletingBlockingQueue
>
> commit cef8a587d7fd2fe64cc644da5ed095d82e46f631
> [FLINK-19245][connectors] Set default capacity for
> FutureCompletingBlockingQueue.
>
> commit 4ea95782b4c6a2538153d4d16ad3f4839c7de0fb
> [FLINK-19223][connectors] Simplify Availability Future Model in Base
> Connector
>
> commit 511857049ba30c8ff0ee56da551fa4a479dc583e
> [FLINK-18128][connectors] Ensure idle split fetchers lead to availability
> notifications.
>
> commit a8206467af0830dcb89623ea068b5ca3b3450c92
> [refactor][core] Eagerly initialize the FetchTask to support proper unit
> testing
>
> commit 3b2f54bcb437f98e6137c904045cc51072b5c06b
> [hotfix][tests] Move constants in SplitFetcherTest relevant to only one
> test into test method
>
> commit d7625760a75a508bf05bcddc380bb4d62ee1743e
> [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to SourceReaderBase
>
> commit a5b0d3297748c1be47ad579a88f24df2255a8df1
> [FLINK-17393][connectors] Wakeup the SplitFetchers more elegantly.
>
> commit f42a3ebc3e81a034b7221a803c153636fef34903
> [FLINK-18680][connectors] Make connector base RecordsWithSplitIds more
> lightweight.
>
> commit e3d273de822b085183d09b275a445879ff94b350
> [FLINK-19162][connectors] Add 'recycle()' to the RecordsWithSplitIds to
> support reuse of heavy objects.
>
> commit 8ebc464c2520453a70001cd712abc8dee6ee89e0
> [hotfix][testing] Add a set of parameterizable testing mocks for the Split
> Reader API
>
> commit 930a07438be1185388d7150640f294dfe2a5d378
> [hotfix][connectors] Add RequestSplitEvent to 'flink-connector-base'
>
> commit e945ce8a933bc378844782f784ca473c767ca159
> [refactor][connectors] Backport of the connector-base exception handling
> from the Kafka Connector Pull Request
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:49 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would love to see this FLIP-27 source interface improvement [1] made to
> > 1.11.3.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19698
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:32 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> tzuli...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the replies so far!
> > >
> > > Just to provide a brief update on the status of blockers for 1.11.3 so
> > far:
> > >
> > >
> > > *PR opened, pending reviewer*- [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext
> > may
> > > return END_OF_INPUT if SplitReader.fetch throws (
> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776)
> > >
> > > *PR opened, reviewed + close to being merged*
> > > - [FLINK-19741] Timer service should skip restoring from raw keyed
> stream
> > > if it isn't the writer (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13761)
> > > - [FLINK-19748] Raw keyed stream key group iterator should be skipping
> > > unwritten key groups (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13772)
> > >
> > > *Merged*
> > > - [FLINK-19154] Application mode deletes HA data in case of suspended
> > > ZooKeeper connection
> > > - [FLINK-19569] Upgrade ICU4J to 67.1+
> > >
> > > Right now as it seems, progress is mainly blocked on a reviewer for
> > > FLINK-19717.
> > > Meanwhile, Xintong is keeping an eye on test instabilities [1] to see
> if
> > > there are any fixes that should be applied to `release-1.11`.
> > >
> > > This is also a reminder, that if there are other blockers that we need
> to
> > > be aware of, or a need to re-establish estimated time for getting fixes
> > in
> > > and delay the RC for 1.11.3, please do let us know!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Gordon
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:43 PM Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3 as it contains a number of important
> > > > fixes and thanks Gordon and Xintong for volunteering.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Kostas
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3, and thanks Gordon and Xintong for
> > > > > volunteering as our release managers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Yu
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 09:45, Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Gordan for starting this discussion.
> > > > > > My pleasure to help with the release process.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you~
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM Till Rohrmann <
> > trohrm...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion Gordon. There are over 100
> > > issues
> > > > > > > which are fixed for 1.11.3. Hence +1 for a soonish 1.11.3
> > release.
> > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > for volunteering as our release managers Gordon and Xintong!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Till
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> > > > tzuli...@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to start a discussion for releasing
> > Flink
> > > > > > 1.11.3
> > > > > > >> soon.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> It seems like we already have a few pressing issues that needs
> > to
> > > be
> > > > > > >> included in a new hotfix release:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>    - Heap-based timers’ restore behaviour is causing a
> critical
> > > > recovery
> > > > > > >>    issue for StateFun [1] [2] [3].
> > > > > > >>    - There are several robustness issues for the FLIP-27 new
> > > source
> > > > API,
> > > > > > >>    such as [4]. We already have some users using the FLIP-27
> API
> > > > with
> > > > > > >> 1.11.x,
> > > > > > >>    so it would be important to get those fixes in for 1.11.x
> as
> > > > well.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Apart from the issues that are already marked as blocker for
> > > 1.11.3
> > > > in
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > >> JIRA [5], please let us know in this thread if there is
> already
> > > > ongoing
> > > > > > >> work for other important fixes that we should try to include.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to volunteer for managing this
> release,
> > > and
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > >> try to communicate the priority of pending blockers over the
> > next
> > > > few
> > > > > > >> days.
> > > > > > >> Since the aforementioned issues are quite critical, we’d like
> to
> > > aim
> > > > > > >> for a *feature
> > > > > > >> freeze by the end of next week (Oct. 30th)* and start the
> > release
> > > > voting
> > > > > > >> process the week after.
> > > > > > >> If that is too short of a notice and you might need more time,
> > > > please
> > > > > > let
> > > > > > >> us know!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > > >> Gordon
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19692
> > > > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19741
> > > > > > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19748
> > > > > > >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19717
> > > > > > >> [5]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.3
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Best, Jingsong Lee

Reply via email to