Basically, it would be great to get the latest code in the
flink-connector-files (FLIP-27).

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:57 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephan, it will be great if we can also backport the DataStreamUtils
> related commits that help with collecting output from unbounded streams.
> e.g.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/09a7a66b7313fea64817fe960a8da1265b428efc
>
> I tried to copy and paste the code to unblock myself. but it quickly got
> into the rabbit hole of more and more code.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:02 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I have started with backporting the source API changes. Some minor
>> conflicts to solve, will need a bit more to finish this.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>> > Are there already plans or ongoing efforts for backporting the list of
>> > FLIP-27 changes that you posted?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:08 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> Just to provide some updates concerning the status on the
>> >> test instabilities.
>> >>
>> >> Currently, we have 30 unresolved tickets labeled with `Affects Version`
>> >> 1.11.x.
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> >>
>> >> Among the 30 tickets, 11 of them are:
>> >> - Have occured in the recent 3 months
>> >> - Not confirmed to be pure testability issues
>> >> - Not confirmed to be rare condition cases
>> >>
>> >> It would be nice if someone familiar with these components can take a
>> look
>> >> into these issues.
>> >>
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17159 (ES6)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17912 (Kafka)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17949 (Kafka)
>> >> ⁃ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18444 (Kafka)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18634 (Kafka)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18648 (Kafka)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18807 (Kafka)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19369 (BlobClientTest)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19436 (TPCDS)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19690 (Format/Parquet)
>> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775
>> >> (SystemProcessingTimeServiceTest)
>> >>
>> >> Thank you~
>> >>
>> >> Xintong Song
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > +1 to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x.
>> >> >
>> >> > If possible, that would be great. Many people are looking forward to
>> the
>> >> > FLIP-27 interface, but they don't want to take the risk to upgrade to
>> >> 1.12
>> >> > (And wait 1.12). After all, 1.11 is a relatively stable version.
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > Jingsong
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:24 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Thanks for starting this.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > +1 form my side to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There were quite a few changes, and I think we need to cherry-pick
>> >> them
>> >> > all
>> >> > > to not get some inconsistent mix of changes and many merge
>> conflicts.
>> >> > > I made a list below of what we need to add to "release-1.11".
>> >> > >
>> >> > > *#### Core Source API Changes to backport (in REVERSE order)*
>> >> > >
>> >> > >   (Use: "git log
>> >> > > flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/connector/source")
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
>> >> > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API
>> and
>> >> > Split
>> >> > > Reader API
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 428fbbad85379f71a9fbf1a1ab3e3dcfa9006436
>> >> > > [FLINK-19205][core] Add access to configuration and hostname in the
>> >> > > SourceReaderContext
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 723e1790744ddc78d19c7c978442af1383f38d33
>> >> > > [hotfix][core] Add to Source Enumerator convenience methods to
>> assign
>> >> > > single split
>> >> > >
>> >> > > *#### Connector Base Changes to Backport (in REVERSE order)*
>> >> > >
>> >> > >   (Use: "git log flink-connectors/flink-connector-base")
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 401f56fe9d6b0271260edf9787cdcbfe4d03874d
>> >> > > [FLINK-19427][FLINK-19489][tests] Fix test conditions for
>> >> > > 'SplitFetcherTest.testNotifiesWhenGoingIdleConcurrent()'
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 68c5c2ff779d82a1ff81ffaf60d8a1b283797db1
>> >> > > [FLINK-19448][connector base] Explicitly check for un-expected
>> >> condition
>> >> > > that would leave an inconsistent state
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
>> >> > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between Source API
>> and
>> >> > Split
>> >> > > Reader API
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit c1ca7a4c7c21ec8868c14cdddd43c559625b794c
>> >> > > [refactor][tests] Move some source test utils from
>> >> flink-connector-base
>> >> > to
>> >> > > flink-core
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit ee5c4c211c35c70d28252363bbc8400453609977
>> >> > > [FLINK-19251][connectors] Avoid confusing queue handling in
>> >> > > "SplitReader.handleSplitsChanges()"
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 5abef56b2bf85bcac786f6b16b6899b6cced7176
>> >> > > [FLINK-19250][connectors] Fix error propagation in connector base
>> >> > > (SplitFetcherManager).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 8fcca837c55a9216595ee4c03038b52747098dbb
>> >> > > [hotfix][connectors] Improve JavaDocs for
>> SingleThreadFetcherManager
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 4700bb5dde3303cbe98882f6beb7379425717b01
>> >> > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to
>> >> SourceReaderBase
>> >> > > (part 2)
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 12261c6b7ed6478a9b9f6a69cb58246b83cab9b7
>> >> > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] (follow-up) Wakeup the SplitFetchers more
>> >> > > elegantly.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit c60aaff0249bfd6b5871b7f82e03efc487a54d6b
>> >> > > [hotfix][tests] Extend test coverage for
>> FutureCompletingBlockingQueue
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit cef8a587d7fd2fe64cc644da5ed095d82e46f631
>> >> > > [FLINK-19245][connectors] Set default capacity for
>> >> > > FutureCompletingBlockingQueue.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 4ea95782b4c6a2538153d4d16ad3f4839c7de0fb
>> >> > > [FLINK-19223][connectors] Simplify Availability Future Model in
>> Base
>> >> > > Connector
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 511857049ba30c8ff0ee56da551fa4a479dc583e
>> >> > > [FLINK-18128][connectors] Ensure idle split fetchers lead to
>> >> availability
>> >> > > notifications.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit a8206467af0830dcb89623ea068b5ca3b3450c92
>> >> > > [refactor][core] Eagerly initialize the FetchTask to support proper
>> >> unit
>> >> > > testing
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 3b2f54bcb437f98e6137c904045cc51072b5c06b
>> >> > > [hotfix][tests] Move constants in SplitFetcherTest relevant to only
>> >> one
>> >> > > test into test method
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit d7625760a75a508bf05bcddc380bb4d62ee1743e
>> >> > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements to
>> >> SourceReaderBase
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit a5b0d3297748c1be47ad579a88f24df2255a8df1
>> >> > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] Wakeup the SplitFetchers more elegantly.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit f42a3ebc3e81a034b7221a803c153636fef34903
>> >> > > [FLINK-18680][connectors] Make connector base RecordsWithSplitIds
>> more
>> >> > > lightweight.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit e3d273de822b085183d09b275a445879ff94b350
>> >> > > [FLINK-19162][connectors] Add 'recycle()' to the
>> RecordsWithSplitIds
>> >> to
>> >> > > support reuse of heavy objects.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 8ebc464c2520453a70001cd712abc8dee6ee89e0
>> >> > > [hotfix][testing] Add a set of parameterizable testing mocks for
>> the
>> >> > Split
>> >> > > Reader API
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit 930a07438be1185388d7150640f294dfe2a5d378
>> >> > > [hotfix][connectors] Add RequestSplitEvent to
>> 'flink-connector-base'
>> >> > >
>> >> > > commit e945ce8a933bc378844782f784ca473c767ca159
>> >> > > [refactor][connectors] Backport of the connector-base exception
>> >> handling
>> >> > > from the Kafka Connector Pull Request
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:49 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > I would love to see this FLIP-27 source interface improvement [1]
>> >> made
>> >> > to
>> >> > > > 1.11.3.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19698
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:32 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> > > tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > Thanks for the replies so far!
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Just to provide a brief update on the status of blockers for
>> >> 1.11.3
>> >> > so
>> >> > > > far:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > *PR opened, pending reviewer*- [FLINK-19717]
>> >> > SourceReaderBase.pollNext
>> >> > > > may
>> >> > > > > return END_OF_INPUT if SplitReader.fetch throws (
>> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776)
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > *PR opened, reviewed + close to being merged*
>> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19741] Timer service should skip restoring from raw
>> keyed
>> >> > > stream
>> >> > > > > if it isn't the writer (
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13761)
>> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19748] Raw keyed stream key group iterator should be
>> >> > skipping
>> >> > > > > unwritten key groups (
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13772)
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > *Merged*
>> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19154] Application mode deletes HA data in case of
>> >> suspended
>> >> > > > > ZooKeeper connection
>> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19569] Upgrade ICU4J to 67.1+
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Right now as it seems, progress is mainly blocked on a reviewer
>> >> for
>> >> > > > > FLINK-19717.
>> >> > > > > Meanwhile, Xintong is keeping an eye on test instabilities [1]
>> to
>> >> see
>> >> > > if
>> >> > > > > there are any fixes that should be applied to `release-1.11`.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > This is also a reminder, that if there are other blockers that
>> we
>> >> > need
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > > > be aware of, or a need to re-establish estimated time for
>> getting
>> >> > fixes
>> >> > > > in
>> >> > > > > and delay the RC for 1.11.3, please do let us know!
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Cheers,
>> >> > > > > Gordon
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > [1]
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:43 PM Kostas Kloudas <
>> >> kklou...@apache.org>
>> >> > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3 as it contains a number of
>> >> important
>> >> > > > > > fixes and thanks Gordon and Xintong for volunteering.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Cheers,
>> >> > > > > > Kostas
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3, and thanks Gordon and
>> Xintong
>> >> for
>> >> > > > > > > volunteering as our release managers.
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > Best Regards,
>> >> > > > > > > Yu
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 09:45, Xintong Song <
>> >> > tonysong...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Thanks Gordan for starting this discussion.
>> >> > > > > > > > My pleasure to help with the release process.
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Thank you~
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > Xintong Song
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM Till Rohrmann <
>> >> > > > trohrm...@apache.org
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion Gordon. There are
>> over
>> >> > 100
>> >> > > > > issues
>> >> > > > > > > > > which are fixed for 1.11.3. Hence +1 for a soonish
>> 1.11.3
>> >> > > > release.
>> >> > > > > > Thanks
>> >> > > > > > > > > for volunteering as our release managers Gordon and
>> >> Xintong!
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> >> > > > > > > > > Till
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Hi,
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to start a discussion for
>> >> releasing
>> >> > > > Flink
>> >> > > > > > > > 1.11.3
>> >> > > > > > > > >> soon.
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> It seems like we already have a few pressing issues
>> that
>> >> > needs
>> >> > > > to
>> >> > > > > be
>> >> > > > > > > > >> included in a new hotfix release:
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >>    - Heap-based timers’ restore behaviour is causing a
>> >> > > critical
>> >> > > > > > recovery
>> >> > > > > > > > >>    issue for StateFun [1] [2] [3].
>> >> > > > > > > > >>    - There are several robustness issues for the
>> FLIP-27
>> >> new
>> >> > > > > source
>> >> > > > > > API,
>> >> > > > > > > > >>    such as [4]. We already have some users using the
>> >> FLIP-27
>> >> > > API
>> >> > > > > > with
>> >> > > > > > > > >> 1.11.x,
>> >> > > > > > > > >>    so it would be important to get those fixes in for
>> >> 1.11.x
>> >> > > as
>> >> > > > > > well.
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Apart from the issues that are already marked as
>> blocker
>> >> for
>> >> > > > > 1.11.3
>> >> > > > > > in
>> >> > > > > > > > our
>> >> > > > > > > > >> JIRA [5], please let us know in this thread if there
>> is
>> >> > > already
>> >> > > > > > ongoing
>> >> > > > > > > > >> work for other important fixes that we should try to
>> >> > include.
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to volunteer for managing
>> this
>> >> > > release,
>> >> > > > > and
>> >> > > > > > > > will
>> >> > > > > > > > >> try to communicate the priority of pending blockers
>> over
>> >> the
>> >> > > > next
>> >> > > > > > few
>> >> > > > > > > > >> days.
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Since the aforementioned issues are quite critical,
>> we’d
>> >> > like
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > > > aim
>> >> > > > > > > > >> for a *feature
>> >> > > > > > > > >> freeze by the end of next week (Oct. 30th)* and start
>> the
>> >> > > > release
>> >> > > > > > voting
>> >> > > > > > > > >> process the week after.
>> >> > > > > > > > >> If that is too short of a notice and you might need
>> more
>> >> > time,
>> >> > > > > > please
>> >> > > > > > > > let
>> >> > > > > > > > >> us know!
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
>> >> > > > > > > > >> Gordon
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19692
>> >> > > > > > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19741
>> >> > > > > > > > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19748
>> >> > > > > > > > >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19717
>> >> > > > > > > > >> [5]
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.3
>> >> > > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Best, Jingsong Lee
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to