Hi devs,

I'd like to provide an update on the progress of preparing release 1.11.3.

*Blockers*
We currently have 3 remaining blockers. (3 resolved and 1 emerged compared
to last week)

- [FLINK-19698] Add close() method and onCheckpointComplete() to the Source.
The issue has been fixed on the master branch. It's currently blocked on
the FLIP-27 backportings to backport it to the 1.11 branch.

- [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext may return END_OF_INPUT if
SplitReader.fetch throws
A PR has been opened and reviewed. From the discussions on the PR, it looks
close to mergeable.

- [FLINK-19816] Flink restored from a wrong checkpoint (a very old one and
not the last completed one)
This is a newly emerged blocker and Matthias is working on it.

*Test Instabilities*
We currently have 27 test instabilities[1].
AFAIK, none of them are as serious as to block the 1.11.3 release.

*FLIP-27 Backprotings*

I noticed that there's no jira issues opened on the FLIP-27 backporting
efforts, which is part of the major efforts planned for the 1.11.3 release,
making it hard to track the progress.


@Stephan and @Becket, could you please share the updates on the backporting
efforts? How is the progress and when are the efforts expected to be
finished? It would be appreciated and helpful if we can have a jira ticket
to track the backporing progress publicly.


Thank you~

Xintong Song


[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16908?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for the efforts so far with pushing for 1.11.3.
>
> I'd like to provide a mid-week update on how we're looking with all the
> pending blockers and backports:
>
> *Blockers**:*
>
> Currently all blockers either have an open PR, or have been merged. I'll
> highlight below the blockers *that still require reviewing efforts for them
> to move forward:*
>
> - [FLINK-19909] Flink application in attach mode could not terminate when
> the only job is canceled. PR: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13911
> - [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext may return END_OF_INPUT if
> SplitReader.fetch throws. PR: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776
>
> The above PRs currently have no reviews at all yet. They seem to already
> have designated reviewers.
>
>
> *Backports:*
> - FLIP-27 robustness improvement backports: Stephan is currently working on
> backporting several FLIP-27 changes. There are no PRs yet for the
> backported changes.
> - DataStreamUtils.collect() refactorings backport: Steven Wu mentioned to
> backport this, but AFAIK this isn't assigned to anyone yet.
>
> *ETAs*:
>
> I'd like to request ETAs for the remaining backports, to prevent a creep in
> the scope of this bugfix release.
>
> We already have Flink users that would benefit from fixes that have been
> merged to release-1.11 already, so technically speaking the backports
> should be considered "nice-to-have" (to the best of my knowledge of the
> changes) and could potentially be moved to a follow-up 1.11.4.
> Most notably, the Stateful Functions project is already waiting on Flink
> 1.11.3 to address critical recovery issues (please see the StateFun 2.2.1
> release discussion thread [1]).
>
> @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> @Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> could
> you provide an ETA for the FLIP-27 backports? It would help to get a better
> estimate to decide how we proceed here.
>
> Cheers,
> Gordon
>
> [1]
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-StateFun-hotfix-version-2-2-1-td46239.html
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > > The collect() utils can be picked back, I see no issue with that (it is
> > isolated utilities).
> >
> > Just checking on all the requested backports mentioned in this thread,
> and
> > figuring out which ones seem to still be unassigned / open.
> >
> > Is someone working on backporting
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/09a7a66b7313fea64817fe960a8da1265b428efc
> > to release-1.11 at the moment?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:39 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> yeah, we can do that. don't worry
> about
> >> it. your earlier email had the perfect explanation on why file source
> >> shouldn't be backported.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:37 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > @Steven would it be possible to initially copy some of the code into
> the
> >> > iceberg source and later replace it by a dependency on the Flink file
> >> > source?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:33 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Stephan, thanks a lot for explaining the file connector. that makes
> >> > sense.
> >> > >
> >> > > I was asking because we were trying to reuse some of the
> >> implementations
> >> > in
> >> > > the file source for Iceberg source. Flink Iceberg source lives in
> the
> >> > > Iceberg repo, which is not possible to code against the master
> branch
> >> of
> >> > > the Flink code.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:31 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Steven!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > So far there are no plans to pick back the file system connector
> >> code.
> >> > > This
> >> > > > is still evolving and not finalized for 1.12, so I don't feel it
> is
> >> a
> >> > > good
> >> > > > candidate to be backported.
> >> > > > However, with the base connector changes backported, you should be
> >> able
> >> > > to
> >> > > > run the file connector code from master against 1.11.3.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The collect() utils can be picked back, I see no issue with that
> >> (it is
> >> > > > isolated utilities).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best,
> >> > > > Stephan
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:02 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Basically, it would be great to get the latest code in the
> >> > > > > flink-connector-files (FLIP-27).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:57 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Stephan, it will be great if we can also backport the
> >> > DataStreamUtils
> >> > > > > > related commits that help with collecting output from
> unbounded
> >> > > > streams.
> >> > > > > > e.g.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/09a7a66b7313fea64817fe960a8da1265b428efc
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I tried to copy and paste the code to unblock myself. but it
> >> > quickly
> >> > > > got
> >> > > > > > into the rabbit hole of more and more code.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:02 AM Stephan Ewen <
> se...@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> I have started with backporting the source API changes. Some
> >> minor
> >> > > > > >> conflicts to solve, will need a bit more to finish this.
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
> >> > > > > tzuli...@apache.org>
> >> > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> > @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> >> > > > > >> > Are there already plans or ongoing efforts for backporting
> >> the
> >> > > list
> >> > > > of
> >> > > > > >> > FLIP-27 changes that you posted?
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:08 PM Xintong Song <
> >> > > tonysong...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> Hi folks,
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Just to provide some updates concerning the status on the
> >> > > > > >> >> test instabilities.
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Currently, we have 30 unresolved tickets labeled with
> >> `Affects
> >> > > > > Version`
> >> > > > > >> >> 1.11.x.
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Among the 30 tickets, 11 of them are:
> >> > > > > >> >> - Have occured in the recent 3 months
> >> > > > > >> >> - Not confirmed to be pure testability issues
> >> > > > > >> >> - Not confirmed to be rare condition cases
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> It would be nice if someone familiar with these components
> >> can
> >> > > > take a
> >> > > > > >> look
> >> > > > > >> >> into these issues.
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17159 (ES6)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17912
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17949
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> ⁃ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18444
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18634
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18648
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18807
> (Kafka)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19369
> >> > > > (BlobClientTest)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19436
> (TPCDS)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19690
> >> > > > (Format/Parquet)
> >> > > > > >> >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775
> >> > > > > >> >> (SystemProcessingTimeServiceTest)
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Thank you~
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Xintong Song
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jingsong Li <
> >> > > > jingsongl...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > +1 to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to 1.11.x.
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> > If possible, that would be great. Many people are
> looking
> >> > > forward
> >> > > > > to
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> > FLIP-27 interface, but they don't want to take the risk
> to
> >> > > > upgrade
> >> > > > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> 1.12
> >> > > > > >> >> > (And wait 1.12). After all, 1.11 is a relatively stable
> >> > > version.
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> > Best,
> >> > > > > >> >> > Jingsong
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:24 AM Stephan Ewen <
> >> > se...@apache.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > Thanks for starting this.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > +1 form my side to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to
> >> > > 1.11.x.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > There were quite a few changes, and I think we need to
> >> > > > > cherry-pick
> >> > > > > >> >> them
> >> > > > > >> >> > all
> >> > > > > >> >> > > to not get some inconsistent mix of changes and many
> >> merge
> >> > > > > >> conflicts.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > I made a list below of what we need to add to
> >> > "release-1.11".
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > *#### Core Source API Changes to backport (in REVERSE
> >> > order)*
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >   (Use: "git log
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/connector/source")
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between
> >> > Source
> >> > > > API
> >> > > > > >> and
> >> > > > > >> >> > Split
> >> > > > > >> >> > > Reader API
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 428fbbad85379f71a9fbf1a1ab3e3dcfa9006436
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19205][core] Add access to configuration and
> >> > hostname
> >> > > in
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > >> >> > > SourceReaderContext
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 723e1790744ddc78d19c7c978442af1383f38d33
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][core] Add to Source Enumerator convenience
> >> methods
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > >> assign
> >> > > > > >> >> > > single split
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > *#### Connector Base Changes to Backport (in REVERSE
> >> > order)*
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >   (Use: "git log
> flink-connectors/flink-connector-base")
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 401f56fe9d6b0271260edf9787cdcbfe4d03874d
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19427][FLINK-19489][tests] Fix test conditions
> >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> 'SplitFetcherTest.testNotifiesWhenGoingIdleConcurrent()'
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 68c5c2ff779d82a1ff81ffaf60d8a1b283797db1
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19448][connector base] Explicitly check for
> >> > > un-expected
> >> > > > > >> >> condition
> >> > > > > >> >> > > that would leave an inconsistent state
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source Events between
> >> > Source
> >> > > > API
> >> > > > > >> and
> >> > > > > >> >> > Split
> >> > > > > >> >> > > Reader API
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit c1ca7a4c7c21ec8868c14cdddd43c559625b794c
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [refactor][tests] Move some source test utils from
> >> > > > > >> >> flink-connector-base
> >> > > > > >> >> > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > flink-core
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit ee5c4c211c35c70d28252363bbc8400453609977
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19251][connectors] Avoid confusing queue
> >> handling in
> >> > > > > >> >> > > "SplitReader.handleSplitsChanges()"
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 5abef56b2bf85bcac786f6b16b6899b6cced7176
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19250][connectors] Fix error propagation in
> >> > connector
> >> > > > base
> >> > > > > >> >> > > (SplitFetcherManager).
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 8fcca837c55a9216595ee4c03038b52747098dbb
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][connectors] Improve JavaDocs for
> >> > > > > >> SingleThreadFetcherManager
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 4700bb5dde3303cbe98882f6beb7379425717b01
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements
> to
> >> > > > > >> >> SourceReaderBase
> >> > > > > >> >> > > (part 2)
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 12261c6b7ed6478a9b9f6a69cb58246b83cab9b7
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] (follow-up) Wakeup the
> >> > > SplitFetchers
> >> > > > > more
> >> > > > > >> >> > > elegantly.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit c60aaff0249bfd6b5871b7f82e03efc487a54d6b
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][tests] Extend test coverage for
> >> > > > > >> FutureCompletingBlockingQueue
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit cef8a587d7fd2fe64cc644da5ed095d82e46f631
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19245][connectors] Set default capacity for
> >> > > > > >> >> > > FutureCompletingBlockingQueue.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 4ea95782b4c6a2538153d4d16ad3f4839c7de0fb
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19223][connectors] Simplify Availability Future
> >> > Model
> >> > > in
> >> > > > > >> Base
> >> > > > > >> >> > > Connector
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 511857049ba30c8ff0ee56da551fa4a479dc583e
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-18128][connectors] Ensure idle split fetchers
> >> lead
> >> > to
> >> > > > > >> >> availability
> >> > > > > >> >> > > notifications.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit a8206467af0830dcb89623ea068b5ca3b3450c92
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [refactor][core] Eagerly initialize the FetchTask to
> >> > support
> >> > > > > proper
> >> > > > > >> >> unit
> >> > > > > >> >> > > testing
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 3b2f54bcb437f98e6137c904045cc51072b5c06b
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][tests] Move constants in SplitFetcherTest
> >> relevant
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > only
> >> > > > > >> >> one
> >> > > > > >> >> > > test into test method
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit d7625760a75a508bf05bcddc380bb4d62ee1743e
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small improvements
> to
> >> > > > > >> >> SourceReaderBase
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit a5b0d3297748c1be47ad579a88f24df2255a8df1
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-17393][connectors] Wakeup the SplitFetchers
> more
> >> > > > > elegantly.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit f42a3ebc3e81a034b7221a803c153636fef34903
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-18680][connectors] Make connector base
> >> > > > RecordsWithSplitIds
> >> > > > > >> more
> >> > > > > >> >> > > lightweight.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit e3d273de822b085183d09b275a445879ff94b350
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [FLINK-19162][connectors] Add 'recycle()' to the
> >> > > > > >> RecordsWithSplitIds
> >> > > > > >> >> to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > support reuse of heavy objects.
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 8ebc464c2520453a70001cd712abc8dee6ee89e0
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][testing] Add a set of parameterizable testing
> >> > mocks
> >> > > > for
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> > Split
> >> > > > > >> >> > > Reader API
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit 930a07438be1185388d7150640f294dfe2a5d378
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [hotfix][connectors] Add RequestSplitEvent to
> >> > > > > >> 'flink-connector-base'
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > commit e945ce8a933bc378844782f784ca473c767ca159
> >> > > > > >> >> > > [refactor][connectors] Backport of the connector-base
> >> > > exception
> >> > > > > >> >> handling
> >> > > > > >> >> > > from the Kafka Connector Pull Request
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:49 PM Steven Wu <
> >> > > > stevenz...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > I would love to see this FLIP-27 source interface
> >> > > improvement
> >> > > > > [1]
> >> > > > > >> >> made
> >> > > > > >> >> > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > 1.11.3.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19698
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:32 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon)
> Tai <
> >> > > > > >> >> > > tzuli...@apache.org>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Thanks for the replies so far!
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Just to provide a brief update on the status of
> >> > blockers
> >> > > > for
> >> > > > > >> >> 1.11.3
> >> > > > > >> >> > so
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > far:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > *PR opened, pending reviewer*- [FLINK-19717]
> >> > > > > >> >> > SourceReaderBase.pollNext
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > may
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > return END_OF_INPUT if SplitReader.fetch throws (
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776)
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > *PR opened, reviewed + close to being merged*
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19741] Timer service should skip
> restoring
> >> > from
> >> > > > raw
> >> > > > > >> keyed
> >> > > > > >> >> > > stream
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > if it isn't the writer (
> >> > > > > >> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13761)
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19748] Raw keyed stream key group
> iterator
> >> > > should
> >> > > > be
> >> > > > > >> >> > skipping
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > unwritten key groups (
> >> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13772)
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > *Merged*
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19154] Application mode deletes HA data
> in
> >> > case
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > >> >> suspended
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > ZooKeeper connection
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > - [FLINK-19569] Upgrade ICU4J to 67.1+
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Right now as it seems, progress is mainly blocked
> >> on a
> >> > > > > reviewer
> >> > > > > >> >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > FLINK-19717.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Meanwhile, Xintong is keeping an eye on test
> >> > > instabilities
> >> > > > > [1]
> >> > > > > >> to
> >> > > > > >> >> see
> >> > > > > >> >> > > if
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > there are any fixes that should be applied to
> >> > > > `release-1.11`.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > This is also a reminder, that if there are other
> >> > blockers
> >> > > > > that
> >> > > > > >> we
> >> > > > > >> >> > need
> >> > > > > >> >> > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > be aware of, or a need to re-establish estimated
> >> time
> >> > for
> >> > > > > >> getting
> >> > > > > >> >> > fixes
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > in
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > and delay the RC for 1.11.3, please do let us
> know!
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Gordon
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > [1]
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:43 PM Kostas Kloudas <
> >> > > > > >> >> kklou...@apache.org>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3 as it contains a
> >> number
> >> > > of
> >> > > > > >> >> important
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > fixes and thanks Gordon and Xintong for
> >> volunteering.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Kostas
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Yu Li <
> >> > > car...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3, and thanks
> Gordon
> >> > and
> >> > > > > >> Xintong
> >> > > > > >> >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > volunteering as our release managers.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Best Regards,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Yu
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 09:45, Xintong Song <
> >> > > > > >> >> > tonysong...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Thanks Gordan for starting this discussion.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > My pleasure to help with the release
> process.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Thank you~
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Xintong Song
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM Till
> >> Rohrmann <
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > trohrm...@apache.org
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion
> Gordon.
> >> > There
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > > >> over
> >> > > > > >> >> > 100
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > issues
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > which are fixed for 1.11.3. Hence +1 for a
> >> > > soonish
> >> > > > > >> 1.11.3
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > release.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > for volunteering as our release managers
> >> Gordon
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > >> >> Xintong!
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Till
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM Tzu-Li
> >> (Gordon)
> >> > > > Tai <
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Hi,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to start a
> >> discussion
> >> > > for
> >> > > > > >> >> releasing
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Flink
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > 1.11.3
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> soon.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> It seems like we already have a few
> >> pressing
> >> > > > issues
> >> > > > > >> that
> >> > > > > >> >> > needs
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > be
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> included in a new hotfix release:
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>    - Heap-based timers’ restore behaviour
> >> is
> >> > > > > causing a
> >> > > > > >> >> > > critical
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > recovery
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>    issue for StateFun [1] [2] [3].
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>    - There are several robustness issues
> >> for
> >> > the
> >> > > > > >> FLIP-27
> >> > > > > >> >> new
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > source
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > API,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>    such as [4]. We already have some
> users
> >> > using
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > >> >> FLIP-27
> >> > > > > >> >> > > API
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > with
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> 1.11.x,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>    so it would be important to get those
> >> fixes
> >> > > in
> >> > > > > for
> >> > > > > >> >> 1.11.x
> >> > > > > >> >> > > as
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > well.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Apart from the issues that are already
> >> marked
> >> > as
> >> > > > > >> blocker
> >> > > > > >> >> for
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > 1.11.3
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > in
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > our
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> JIRA [5], please let us know in this
> >> thread if
> >> > > > there
> >> > > > > >> is
> >> > > > > >> >> > > already
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > ongoing
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> work for other important fixes that we
> >> should
> >> > > try
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > include.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Xintong and I would like to volunteer for
> >> > > managing
> >> > > > > >> this
> >> > > > > >> >> > > release,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > and
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > will
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> try to communicate the priority of
> pending
> >> > > > blockers
> >> > > > > >> over
> >> > > > > >> >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > next
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > few
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> days.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Since the aforementioned issues are quite
> >> > > > critical,
> >> > > > > >> we’d
> >> > > > > >> >> > like
> >> > > > > >> >> > > to
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > aim
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> for a *feature
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> freeze by the end of next week (Oct.
> 30th)*
> >> > and
> >> > > > > start
> >> > > > > >> the
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > release
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > voting
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> process the week after.
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> If that is too short of a notice and you
> >> might
> >> > > > need
> >> > > > > >> more
> >> > > > > >> >> > time,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > please
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > let
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> us know!
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Cheers,
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Gordon
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> [1]
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19692
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> [2]
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19741
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> [3]
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19748
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> [4]
> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19717
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> [5]
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.3
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> >> > >
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> > --
> >> > > > > >> >> > Best, Jingsong Lee
> >> > > > > >> >> >
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to