Hi All! I have found the following issue today which might be considered a blocker for this release as well:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20221 Could someone please quickly provide a second set of eyes and confirm that this is indeed a big problem? :) Thank you! Gyula On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:12 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi devs, > > Updates on the progress of preparing the 1.11.3 release. > > We are approaching the creation of our first release candidate. Thanks all > for the efforts so far. > > # Ongoing threads > > - *FLIP-27 backportings:* 74 out of 102 commits are already backported. > Stephan and Becket are actively working on this. > - *Blockers:* There are 2 remaining blockers, both have been fixed on > the master branch and should be backported along with the FLIP-27 > changes. > > As soon as the above threads are done, we will create our first release > candidate. If there's any other issues that you believe should be a release > blocker, please reach out to either me or Gordon. > > # JIRA version > > Version 1.11.4 has been created on JIRA. I've already tagged some of the > tickets with the new fix version. Please feel free to continue with the > efforts and merge once they are ready. I'll double check and update the fix > versions before the release. > > Thank you~ > > Xintong Song > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 1:31 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the notice and fix, Roman. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:53 PM Khachatryan Roman < > > khachatryan.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like FLINK-20079 [1] to be merged into 1.11 and included in 1.11.3. > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20079 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Roman > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 8:21 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for the notice, Dian. > >> > > >> > Thank you~ > >> > > >> > Xintong Song > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Xintong, > >> > > > >> > > I want to bring one more issue to your attention [1]. The test case > >> > > UnalignedCheckpointCompatibilityITCase.test failed several times in > >> the > >> > > last nightly test of release-1.11. We need to figure out if it's > just > >> an > >> > > instable test or caused by recent changes. > >> > > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20065 > >> > > > >> > > > 在 2020年11月10日，上午9:24，Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 写道： > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks for the replies. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thank you~ > >> > > > > >> > > > Xintong Song > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:09 AM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Hi Xintong, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks for driving the release. Just want to sync up on the > FLIP-27 > >> > > >> backporting. Stephan and I are still trying to backport a bunch > of > >> > > patches > >> > > >> of Source to 1.11.3. Including: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [FLINK-19698][connector/common] Add a close() method to the > >> > SplitReader. > >> > > >> [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext may return END_OF_INPUT > if > >> > > >> SplitReader.fetch throws > >> > > >> [FLINK-19535] [connector/common] Avoid failing a job multiple > >> times in > >> > > >> SourceCoordinator. > >> > > >> [FLINK-19265] [FLINK-20049][core] Source API final adjustments. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> and a few more fixes. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> We are currently trying to fix them in 1.12 first so it might > take > >> a > >> > > little > >> > > >> longer to backport them to 1.11.3. I think it will probably take > >> us a > >> > > few > >> > > >> more days to finish the backport. So that would roughly be the > end > >> of > >> > > this > >> > > >> week. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Thanks, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:57 PM Till Rohrmann < > trohrm...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> Yes, I've downgraded FLINK-19816 to critical. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Cheers, > >> > > >>> Till > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:19 AM Xintong Song < > >> tonysong...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>> Thanks for the notice, Till. > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> I just checked and found FLINK-20033 is already fixed. Shall we > >> also > >> > > >>>> downgrade FLINK-19816 to `Critical`? > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Thank you~ > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Xintong Song > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:42 PM Till Rohrmann < > >> trohrm...@apache.org> > >> > > >>> wrote: > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>>> I would like to bring one more critical issue to your > attention > >> > which > >> > > >>> is > >> > > >>>>> FLINK-20033 [1]. I believe that this issue is actually causing > >> what > >> > > >> has > >> > > >>>>> been reported in FLINK-19816 [2]. I hope to have it fixed by > the > >> > end > >> > > >> of > >> > > >>>>> today. Once FLINK-20033 is fixed, I think that we don't have > to > >> > block > >> > > >>> the > >> > > >>>>> release on FLINK-19816. > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20033 > >> > > >>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19816 > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>> Till > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:05 AM Xintong Song < > >> tonysong...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > >>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Hi devs, > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I'd like to provide an update on the progress of preparing > >> release > >> > > >>>>> 1.11.3. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> *Blockers* > >> > > >>>>>> We currently have 3 remaining blockers. (3 resolved and 1 > >> emerged > >> > > >>>>> compared > >> > > >>>>>> to last week) > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> - [FLINK-19698] Add close() method and onCheckpointComplete() > >> to > >> > > >> the > >> > > >>>>>> Source. > >> > > >>>>>> The issue has been fixed on the master branch. It's currently > >> > > >> blocked > >> > > >>>> on > >> > > >>>>>> the FLIP-27 backportings to backport it to the 1.11 branch. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> - [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext may return > >> END_OF_INPUT > >> > > >> if > >> > > >>>>>> SplitReader.fetch throws > >> > > >>>>>> A PR has been opened and reviewed. From the discussions on > the > >> PR, > >> > > >> it > >> > > >>>>> looks > >> > > >>>>>> close to mergeable. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> - [FLINK-19816] Flink restored from a wrong checkpoint (a > very > >> old > >> > > >>> one > >> > > >>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>> not the last completed one) > >> > > >>>>>> This is a newly emerged blocker and Matthias is working on > it. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> *Test Instabilities* > >> > > >>>>>> We currently have 27 test instabilities[1]. > >> > > >>>>>> AFAIK, none of them are as serious as to block the 1.11.3 > >> release. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> *FLIP-27 Backprotings* > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I noticed that there's no jira issues opened on the FLIP-27 > >> > > >>> backporting > >> > > >>>>>> efforts, which is part of the major efforts planned for the > >> 1.11.3 > >> > > >>>>> release, > >> > > >>>>>> making it hard to track the progress. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> @Stephan and @Becket, could you please share the updates on > the > >> > > >>>>> backporting > >> > > >>>>>> efforts? How is the progress and when are the efforts > expected > >> to > >> > > >> be > >> > > >>>>>> finished? It would be appreciated and helpful if we can have > a > >> > jira > >> > > >>>>> ticket > >> > > >>>>>> to track the backporing progress publicly. > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Thank you~ > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Xintong Song > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16908?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:58 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >> > > >>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Thanks for the efforts so far with pushing for 1.11.3. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> I'd like to provide a mid-week update on how we're looking > >> with > >> > > >> all > >> > > >>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>> pending blockers and backports: > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Blockers**:* > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Currently all blockers either have an open PR, or have been > >> > > >> merged. > >> > > >>>>> I'll > >> > > >>>>>>> highlight below the blockers *that still require reviewing > >> > > >> efforts > >> > > >>>> for > >> > > >>>>>> them > >> > > >>>>>>> to move forward:* > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-19909] Flink application in attach mode could not > >> > > >>> terminate > >> > > >>>>> when > >> > > >>>>>>> the only job is canceled. PR: > >> > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13911 > >> > > >>>>>>> - [FLINK-19717] SourceReaderBase.pollNext may return > >> END_OF_INPUT > >> > > >>> if > >> > > >>>>>>> SplitReader.fetch throws. PR: > >> > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776 > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> The above PRs currently have no reviews at all yet. They > seem > >> to > >> > > >>>>> already > >> > > >>>>>>> have designated reviewers. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *Backports:* > >> > > >>>>>>> - FLIP-27 robustness improvement backports: Stephan is > >> currently > >> > > >>>>> working > >> > > >>>>>> on > >> > > >>>>>>> backporting several FLIP-27 changes. There are no PRs yet > for > >> the > >> > > >>>>>>> backported changes. > >> > > >>>>>>> - DataStreamUtils.collect() refactorings backport: Steven Wu > >> > > >>>> mentioned > >> > > >>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>> backport this, but AFAIK this isn't assigned to anyone yet. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> *ETAs*: > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> I'd like to request ETAs for the remaining backports, to > >> prevent > >> > > >> a > >> > > >>>>> creep > >> > > >>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>> the scope of this bugfix release. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> We already have Flink users that would benefit from fixes > that > >> > > >> have > >> > > >>>>> been > >> > > >>>>>>> merged to release-1.11 already, so technically speaking the > >> > > >>> backports > >> > > >>>>>>> should be considered "nice-to-have" (to the best of my > >> knowledge > >> > > >> of > >> > > >>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>> changes) and could potentially be moved to a follow-up > 1.11.4. > >> > > >>>>>>> Most notably, the Stateful Functions project is already > >> waiting > >> > > >> on > >> > > >>>>> Flink > >> > > >>>>>>> 1.11.3 to address critical recovery issues (please see the > >> > > >> StateFun > >> > > >>>>> 2.2.1 > >> > > >>>>>>> release discussion thread [1]). > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> @Becket Qin < > >> > > >> becket....@gmail.com > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>>>> could > >> > > >>>>>>> you provide an ETA for the FLIP-27 backports? It would help > to > >> > > >> get > >> > > >>> a > >> > > >>>>>> better > >> > > >>>>>>> estimate to decide how we proceed here. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>>>> Gordon > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-StateFun-hotfix-version-2-2-1-td46239.html > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >> > > >>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> The collect() utils can be picked back, I see no issue > with > >> > > >>> that > >> > > >>>>> (it > >> > > >>>>>> is > >> > > >>>>>>>> isolated utilities). > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Just checking on all the requested backports mentioned in > >> this > >> > > >>>>> thread, > >> > > >>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>> figuring out which ones seem to still be unassigned / open. > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Is someone working on backporting > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/09a7a66b7313fea64817fe960a8da1265b428efc > >> > > >>>>>>>> to release-1.11 at the moment? > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 1:39 AM Steven Wu < > >> stevenz...@gmail.com > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> yeah, we can do that. > >> don't > >> > > >>>> worry > >> > > >>>>>>> about > >> > > >>>>>>>>> it. your earlier email had the perfect explanation on why > >> file > >> > > >>>>> source > >> > > >>>>>>>>> shouldn't be backported. > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:37 AM Stephan Ewen < > >> se...@apache.org > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> @Steven would it be possible to initially copy some of > the > >> > > >>> code > >> > > >>>>> into > >> > > >>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> iceberg source and later replace it by a dependency on > the > >> > > >>> Flink > >> > > >>>>>> file > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> source? > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:33 PM Steven Wu < > >> > > >>> stevenz...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Stephan, thanks a lot for explaining the file connector. > >> > > >>> that > >> > > >>>>>> makes > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> sense. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I was asking because we were trying to reuse some of the > >> > > >>>>>>>>> implementations > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the file source for Iceberg source. Flink Iceberg source > >> > > >>> lives > >> > > >>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Iceberg repo, which is not possible to code against the > >> > > >>> master > >> > > >>>>>>> branch > >> > > >>>>>>>>> of > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the Flink code. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:31 AM Stephan Ewen < > >> > > >>> se...@apache.org > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Steven! > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> So far there are no plans to pick back the file system > >> > > >>>>> connector > >> > > >>>>>>>>> code. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> This > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is still evolving and not finalized for 1.12, so I > don't > >> > > >>>> feel > >> > > >>>>> it > >> > > >>>>>>> is > >> > > >>>>>>>>> a > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> good > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate to be backported. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> However, with the base connector changes backported, > you > >> > > >>>>> should > >> > > >>>>>> be > >> > > >>>>>>>>> able > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> run the file connector code from master against 1.11.3. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The collect() utils can be picked back, I see no issue > >> > > >>> with > >> > > >>>>> that > >> > > >>>>>>>>> (it is > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> isolated utilities). > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:02 AM Steven Wu < > >> > > >>>>> stevenz...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, it would be great to get the latest code in > >> > > >>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-connector-files (FLIP-27). > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:57 AM Steven Wu < > >> > > >>>>>> stevenz...@gmail.com > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan, it will be great if we can also backport > >> > > >> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> DataStreamUtils > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> related commits that help with collecting output > >> > > >> from > >> > > >>>>>>> unbounded > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> streams. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/09a7a66b7313fea64817fe960a8da1265b428efc > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to copy and paste the code to unblock > >> > > >> myself. > >> > > >>>> but > >> > > >>>>> it > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> quickly > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the rabbit hole of more and more code. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:02 AM Stephan Ewen < > >> > > >>>>>>> se...@apache.org > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have started with backporting the source API > >> > > >>> changes. > >> > > >>>>>> Some > >> > > >>>>>>>>> minor > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts to solve, will need a bit more to finish > >> > > >>>> this. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 7:25 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) > >> > > >> Tai < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there already plans or ongoing efforts for > >> > > >>>>>> backporting > >> > > >>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> list > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLIP-27 changes that you posted? > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:08 PM Xintong Song < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to provide some updates concerning the > >> > > >> status > >> > > >>>> on > >> > > >>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test instabilities. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we have 30 unresolved tickets labeled > >> > > >>>> with > >> > > >>>>>>>>> `Affects > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Version` > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.x. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775?filter=12348580&jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2%2C%201.11.3)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Among the 30 tickets, 11 of them are: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Have occured in the recent 3 months > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Not confirmed to be pure testability issues > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Not confirmed to be rare condition cases > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if someone familiar with these > >> > > >>>>>> components > >> > > >>>>>>>>> can > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> take a > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into these issues. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17159 > >> > > >>>>>> (ES6) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17912 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17949 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ⁃ > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18444 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18634 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18648 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18807 > >> > > >>>>>>> (Kafka) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19369 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (BlobClientTest) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19436 > >> > > >>>>>>> (TPCDS) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19690 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (Format/Parquet) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19775 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (SystemProcessingTimeServiceTest) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~ > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jingsong Li < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> jingsongl...@gmail.com > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to backport the FLIP-27 adjustments to > >> > > >>> 1.11.x. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If possible, that would be great. Many people > >> > > >>> are > >> > > >>>>>>> looking > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> forward > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLIP-27 interface, but they don't want to take > >> > > >>> the > >> > > >>>>>> risk > >> > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.12 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (And wait 1.12). After all, 1.11 is a > >> > > >> relatively > >> > > >>>>>> stable > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> version. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jingsong > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:24 AM Stephan Ewen < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 form my side to backport the FLIP-27 > >> > > >>>>> adjustments > >> > > >>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.x. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There were quite a few changes, and I think > >> > > >> we > >> > > >>>>> need > >> > > >>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not get some inconsistent mix of changes > >> > > >>> and > >> > > >>>>> many > >> > > >>>>>>>>> merge > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I made a list below of what we need to add > >> > > >> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> "release-1.11". > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *#### Core Source API Changes to backport > >> > > >> (in > >> > > >>>>>> REVERSE > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> order)* > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Use: "git log > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/connector/source") > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source > >> > > >> Events > >> > > >>>>>> between > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Source > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Split > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reader API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 428fbbad85379f71a9fbf1a1ab3e3dcfa9006436 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19205][core] Add access to > >> > > >>> configuration > >> > > >>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> hostname > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceReaderContext > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 723e1790744ddc78d19c7c978442af1383f38d33 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][core] Add to Source Enumerator > >> > > >>>>> convenience > >> > > >>>>>>>>> methods > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> single split > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *#### Connector Base Changes to Backport (in > >> > > >>>>> REVERSE > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> order)* > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Use: "git log > >> > > >>>>>>> flink-connectors/flink-connector-base") > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 401f56fe9d6b0271260edf9787cdcbfe4d03874d > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19427][FLINK-19489][tests] Fix test > >> > > >>>>>> conditions > >> > > >>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> 'SplitFetcherTest.testNotifiesWhenGoingIdleConcurrent()' > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 68c5c2ff779d82a1ff81ffaf60d8a1b283797db1 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19448][connector base] Explicitly > >> > > >> check > >> > > >>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> un-expected > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condition > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would leave an inconsistent state > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 162c072e9265a7b6dd9d6f5459eb7974091c4c4e > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19492][core] Consolidate Source > >> > > >> Events > >> > > >>>>>> between > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Source > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Split > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reader API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> c1ca7a4c7c21ec8868c14cdddd43c559625b794c > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [refactor][tests] Move some source test > >> > > >> utils > >> > > >>>> from > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-connector-base > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-core > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> ee5c4c211c35c70d28252363bbc8400453609977 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19251][connectors] Avoid confusing > >> > > >>> queue > >> > > >>>>>>>>> handling in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "SplitReader.handleSplitsChanges()" > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 5abef56b2bf85bcac786f6b16b6899b6cced7176 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19250][connectors] Fix error > >> > > >>> propagation > >> > > >>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> connector > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> base > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (SplitFetcherManager). > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 8fcca837c55a9216595ee4c03038b52747098dbb > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][connectors] Improve JavaDocs for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SingleThreadFetcherManager > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 4700bb5dde3303cbe98882f6beb7379425717b01 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small > >> > > >>>>> improvements > >> > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceReaderBase > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (part 2) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 12261c6b7ed6478a9b9f6a69cb58246b83cab9b7 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-17393][connectors] (follow-up) Wakeup > >> > > >>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> SplitFetchers > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elegantly. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> c60aaff0249bfd6b5871b7f82e03efc487a54d6b > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][tests] Extend test coverage for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FutureCompletingBlockingQueue > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> cef8a587d7fd2fe64cc644da5ed095d82e46f631 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19245][connectors] Set default > >> > > >> capacity > >> > > >>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FutureCompletingBlockingQueue. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 4ea95782b4c6a2538153d4d16ad3f4839c7de0fb > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19223][connectors] Simplify > >> > > >>> Availability > >> > > >>>>>> Future > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Model > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Base > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Connector > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 511857049ba30c8ff0ee56da551fa4a479dc583e > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-18128][connectors] Ensure idle split > >> > > >>>>> fetchers > >> > > >>>>>>>>> lead > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> availability > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notifications. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> a8206467af0830dcb89623ea068b5ca3b3450c92 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [refactor][core] Eagerly initialize the > >> > > >>>> FetchTask > >> > > >>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> support > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> proper > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 3b2f54bcb437f98e6137c904045cc51072b5c06b > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][tests] Move constants in > >> > > >>>> SplitFetcherTest > >> > > >>>>>>>>> relevant > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> only > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test into test method > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> d7625760a75a508bf05bcddc380bb4d62ee1743e > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19225][connectors] Various small > >> > > >>>>> improvements > >> > > >>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceReaderBase > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> a5b0d3297748c1be47ad579a88f24df2255a8df1 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-17393][connectors] Wakeup the > >> > > >>>> SplitFetchers > >> > > >>>>>>> more > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> elegantly. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> f42a3ebc3e81a034b7221a803c153636fef34903 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-18680][connectors] Make connector > >> > > >> base > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> RecordsWithSplitIds > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> e3d273de822b085183d09b275a445879ff94b350 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [FLINK-19162][connectors] Add 'recycle()' to > >> > > >>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RecordsWithSplitIds > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support reuse of heavy objects. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 8ebc464c2520453a70001cd712abc8dee6ee89e0 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][testing] Add a set of > >> > > >> parameterizable > >> > > >>>>>> testing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> mocks > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Split > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reader API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> 930a07438be1185388d7150640f294dfe2a5d378 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hotfix][connectors] Add RequestSplitEvent > >> > > >> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'flink-connector-base' > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >> > > >>> e945ce8a933bc378844782f784ca473c767ca159 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [refactor][connectors] Backport of the > >> > > >>>>>> connector-base > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> exception > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> handling > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Kafka Connector Pull Request > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 5:49 PM Steven Wu < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> stevenz...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would love to see this FLIP-27 source > >> > > >>>>> interface > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> improvement > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.3. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19698 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:32 AM Tzu-Li > >> > > >>>> (Gordon) > >> > > >>>>>>> Tai < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the replies so far! > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to provide a brief update on the > >> > > >>> status > >> > > >>>>> of > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> blockers > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.3 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *PR opened, pending reviewer*- > >> > > >>> [FLINK-19717] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceReaderBase.pollNext > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return END_OF_INPUT if SplitReader.fetch > >> > > >>>>> throws > >> > > >>>>>> ( > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13776) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *PR opened, reviewed + close to being > >> > > >>>> merged* > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-19741] Timer service should > >> > > >> skip > >> > > >>>>>>> restoring > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> from > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> raw > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyed > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stream > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it isn't the writer ( > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13761) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-19748] Raw keyed stream key > >> > > >> group > >> > > >>>>>>> iterator > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> should > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skipping > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unwritten key groups ( > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13772) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Merged* > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-19154] Application mode deletes > >> > > >>> HA > >> > > >>>>> data > >> > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> case > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspended > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper connection > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-19569] Upgrade ICU4J to 67.1+ > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right now as it seems, progress is > >> > > >> mainly > >> > > >>>>>> blocked > >> > > >>>>>>>>> on a > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewer > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-19717. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, Xintong is keeping an eye on > >> > > >>> test > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> instabilities > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are any fixes that should be > >> > > >> applied > >> > > >>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> `release-1.11`. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is also a reminder, that if there > >> > > >> are > >> > > >>>>> other > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> blockers > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be aware of, or a need to re-establish > >> > > >>>>> estimated > >> > > >>>>>>>>> time > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and delay the RC for 1.11.3, please do > >> > > >> let > >> > > >>>> us > >> > > >>>>>>> know! > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(1.11.0%2C%201.11.1%2C%201.11.2)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:43 PM Kostas > >> > > >>>>> Kloudas < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kklou...@apache.org> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3 as it > >> > > >>>>> contains a > >> > > >>>>>>>>> number > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes and thanks Gordon and Xintong > >> > > >> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>> volunteering. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kostas > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Yu Li > >> > > >> < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> car...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for releasing Flink 1.11.3, and > >> > > >>>> thanks > >> > > >>>>>>> Gordon > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteering as our release > >> > > >> managers. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 09:45, > >> > > >> Xintong > >> > > >>>>> Song < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Gordan for starting this > >> > > >>>>>> discussion. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My pleasure to help with the > >> > > >> release > >> > > >>>>>>> process. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~ > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:29 PM > >> > > >>> Till > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Rohrmann < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for starting this > >> > > >>> discussion > >> > > >>>>>>> Gordon. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> There > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are fixed for 1.11.3. > >> > > >> Hence > >> > > >>> +1 > >> > > >>>>>> for a > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> soonish > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.3 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for volunteering as our release > >> > > >>>>> managers > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Gordon > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong! > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM > >> > > >>>> Tzu-Li > >> > > >>>>>>>>> (Gordon) > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tai < > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong and I would like to > >> > > >>> start a > >> > > >>>>>>>>> discussion > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.3 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems like we already have a > >> > > >>> few > >> > > >>>>>>>>> pressing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included in a new hotfix > >> > > >> release: > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Heap-based timers’ restore > >> > > >>>>>> behaviour > >> > > >>>>>>>>> is > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> causing a > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue for StateFun [1] [2] > >> > > >>> [3]. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are several > >> > > >> robustness > >> > > >>>>>> issues > >> > > >>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLIP-27 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> such as [4]. We already have > >> > > >>>> some > >> > > >>>>>>> users > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> using > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLIP-27 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.x, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it would be important to > >> > > >>> get > >> > > >>>>>> those > >> > > >>>>>>>>> fixes > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.x > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apart from the issues that are > >> > > >>>>> already > >> > > >>>>>>>>> marked > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> as > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.11.3 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA [5], please let us know in > >> > > >>>> this > >> > > >>>>>>>>> thread if > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> there > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ongoing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work for other important fixes > >> > > >>> that > >> > > >>>>> we > >> > > >>>>>>>>> should > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> try > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong and I would like to > >> > > >>>> volunteer > >> > > >>>>>> for > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> managing > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try to communicate the priority > >> > > >>> of > >> > > >>>>>>> pending > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> blockers > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the aforementioned issues > >> > > >>> are > >> > > >>>>>> quite > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> critical, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we’d > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aim > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a *feature > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> freeze by the end of next week > >> > > >>>> (Oct. > >> > > >>>>>>> 30th)* > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process the week after. > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that is too short of a > >> > > >> notice > >> > > >>>> and > >> > > >>>>>> you > >> > > >>>>>>>>> might > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us know! > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19692 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19741 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19748 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19717 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.3 > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
