Thanks Stephan and Piotr for your replies. It seems that there is no problem or concern about this feature. If there is no further objection, I will start a vote thread for FLIP-172.
Thanks, Wenhao On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:41 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 from my side on this idea. I do not see any problems that could be > caused by this change. > > Best, > Piotrek > > śr., 23 cze 2021 o 08:59 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> napisał(a): > > > The motivation and the proposal sound good to me, +1 from my side. > > > > Would be good to have a quick opinion from someone who worked specifically > > with Kafka, maybe Becket or Piotr? > > > > Best, > > Stephan > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:50 AM Wenhao Ji <predator....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I would like to open this discussion thread to take about the FLIP-172 > >> < > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-172%3A+Support+custom+transactional.id+prefix+in+FlinkKafkaProducer > >> >, > >> which aims to provide a way to support specifying a custom > >> transactional.id > >> in the FlinkKafkaProducer class. > >> > >> I am looking forwards to your feedback and suggestions! > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Wenhao > >> > >
