Sounds good from my side, please go ahead. On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:31 PM Wenhao Ji <predator....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Stephan and Piotr for your replies. It seems that there is no > problem or concern about this feature. If there is no further > objection, I will start a vote thread for FLIP-172. > > Thanks, > Wenhao > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 3:41 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > +1 from my side on this idea. I do not see any problems that could be > > caused by this change. > > > > Best, > > Piotrek > > > > śr., 23 cze 2021 o 08:59 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> napisał(a): > > > > > The motivation and the proposal sound good to me, +1 from my side. > > > > > > Would be good to have a quick opinion from someone who worked > specifically > > > with Kafka, maybe Becket or Piotr? > > > > > > Best, > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:50 AM Wenhao Ji <predator....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> I would like to open this discussion thread to take about the FLIP-172 > > >> < > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-172%3A+Support+custom+transactional.id+prefix+in+FlinkKafkaProducer > > >> >, > > >> which aims to provide a way to support specifying a custom > > >> transactional.id > > >> in the FlinkKafkaProducer class. > > >> > > >> I am looking forwards to your feedback and suggestions! > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Wenhao > > >> > > > >
