Hi Chesnay,
I meet with something weird.
I submit a pull request https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17571,
it trigger a ci
(https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=25470&view=results
<https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=25470&view=results>)
which fails at first time because of python module failure.
I try to run 'run azure' for two times, nothing happened which is
different from the behavior in the past.
I ask some other guys, they said they also meet with this problem.
Please help me check whether it is expected, thanks a lot.
image.png
Best,
JING ZHANG
Yuepeng Pan <flin...@126.com> 于2021年10月12日周二 下午8:08写道：
Thank you for your effort!
Best,
Roc
At 2021-10-12 14:07:18, "Arvid Heise" <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
>Awesome!
>
>On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:11 AM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your effort!
>>
>> Best,
>> Guowei
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:26 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
wrote:
>>
>> > Great initiative, thanks for doing this!
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:52 AM Till Rohrmann
<trohrm...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks a lot for this effort Chesnay! The improvements
sound really
>> good.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Till
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:46 AM David Morávek
<d...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Nice! Thanks for the effort Chesnay, this is really a
huge step
>> > forward!
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > D.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:02 AM Xintong Song
<tonysong...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks for the effort, @Chesnay. This is super helpful.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @Jing,
>> > > > > Every push to the PR branch should automatically
trigger an entire
>> > new
>> > > > > build. `@flinkbot run azure` should only be used when
you want to
>> > > re-run
>> > > > > the failed stages without changing the PR. E.g., when
running into
>> > > known
>> > > > > unstable cases that are unrelated to the PR.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you~
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Xintong Song
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:45 AM JING ZHANG
<beyond1...@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Chesnay,
>> > > > > > Thanks for the effort. It is a very useful improvement.
>> > > > > > I have a minor question. Please forgive me if the
question is too
>> > > > naive.
>> > > > > > Since '@flinkbot run azure' now behaves like "Rerun
failed jobs",
>> > is
>> > > > > there
>> > > > > > any way to trigger an entirely new build? Because
some times I'm
>> > not
>> > > > sure
>> > > > > > the passed cases in the last build could still
success in the new
>> > > build
>> > > > > > because of introduced updates in new commit.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > JING ZHANG
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 于2021年10月11日周一
上午10:31写道：
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks for that great job, Chesnay! "Rerun failed
jobs" will
>> > help a
>> > > > > lot.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > Yangze Guo
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chesnay Schepler <
>> > > ches...@apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I made a number of changes to the CiBot over the
weekend.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > - '@flinkbot run azure' previously triggered an
entirely new
>> > > build
>> > > > > > based
>> > > > > > > > on the last completed one. It now instead retries
the last
>> > > > completed
>> > > > > > > > build, only running the jobs that actually
failed. It
>> basically
>> > > > > behaves
>> > > > > > > > like the "Rerun failed jobs" button in the Azure
UI.
>> > > > > > > > - various optimizations to increase
responsiveness (primarily
>> > by
>> > > > > doing
>> > > > > > > > significantly less unnecessary work / requests
to GH)
>> > > > > > > > - removed TravisCI support (since we no longer
support a
>> > release
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > > > used Travis)
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Please ping me if you spot anything weird.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
