Nice! Thanks for the effort Chesnay, this is really a huge step forward!

Best,
D.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:02 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the effort, @Chesnay. This is super helpful.
>
> @Jing,
> Every push to the PR branch should automatically trigger an entire new
> build. `@flinkbot run azure` should only be used when you want to re-run
> the failed stages without changing the PR. E.g., when running into known
> unstable cases that are unrelated to the PR.
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:45 AM JING ZHANG <beyond1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Chesnay,
> > Thanks for the effort. It is a very useful improvement.
> > I have a minor question. Please forgive me if the question is too naive.
> > Since '@flinkbot run azure' now behaves like "Rerun failed jobs", is
> there
> > any way to trigger an entirely new build? Because some times I'm not sure
> > the passed cases in the last build could still success in the new build
> > because of introduced updates in new commit.
> >
> > Best,
> > JING ZHANG
> >
> >
> > Yangze Guo <karma...@gmail.com> 于2021年10月11日周一 上午10:31写道:
> >
> > > Thanks for that great job, Chesnay! "Rerun failed jobs" will help a
> lot.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yangze Guo
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I made a number of changes to the CiBot over the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > - '@flinkbot run azure' previously triggered an entirely new build
> > based
> > > > on the last completed one. It now instead retries the last completed
> > > > build, only running the jobs that actually failed. It basically
> behaves
> > > > like the "Rerun failed jobs" button in the Azure UI.
> > > > - various optimizations to increase responsiveness (primarily by
> doing
> > > > significantly less unnecessary work / requests to GH)
> > > > - removed TravisCI support (since we no longer support a release that
> > > > used Travis)
> > > >
> > > > Please ping me if you spot anything weird.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to