+1, we've enabled this by default (10mins) in our production for years.

Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年1月13日周五 22:22写道:

> +1 for the proposal that makes users' daily work easier and therefore makes
> Flink more attractive.
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:27 AM Qingsheng Ren <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone for joining the discussion!
> >
> > @Martijn:
> >
> > > All newly discovered partitions will be consumed from the earliest
> offset
> > possible.
> >
> > Thanks for the reminder! I checked the logic of KafkaSource and found
> that
> > new partitions will start from the offset initializer specified by the
> user
> > instead of the earliest. We need to correct this behavior to avoid
> dropping
> > messages from new partitions.
> >
> > > Job restarts from checkpoint
> >
> > I think the current logic guarantees the exactly-once semantic. New
> > partitions created after the checkpoint will be re-discovered again and
> > picked up by the source.
> >
> > @John:
> >
> > > If you want to be a little conservative with the default, 5 minutes
> might
> > be better than 30 seconds.
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion! I tried to find the equivalent config in Kafka
> > but missed it. It would be neat to align with the default value of "
> > metadata.max.age.ms".
> >
> > @Gabor:
> >
> > > removed partition handling is not yet added
> >
> > There was a detailed discussion about removing partitions [1] but it
> looks
> > like this is not an easy task considering the potential data loss and
> state
> > inconsistency. I'm afraid there's no clear plan on this one and maybe we
> > could trigger a new discussion thread about how to correctly handle
> removed
> > partitions.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/7r4h7v5k281w9cnbfw9lb8tp56r30lwt
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Qingsheng
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 4:33 PM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on the overall direction, it's an important feature.
> > >
> > > I've had a look on the latest master and looks like removed partition
> > > handling is not yet added but I think this is essential.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/28c3e1a3923ba560b559a216985c1abeb794ebaa/flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/connector/kafka/source/enumerator/KafkaSourceEnumerator.java#L305
> > >
> > > If a partition all of a sudden disappears then it could lead to data
> > loss.
> > > Are you planning to add it?
> > > If yes then when?
> > >
> > > G
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 9:22 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for this proposal, Qingsheng!
> > > >
> > > > If you want to be a little conservative with the default, 5 minutes
> > might
> > > > be better than 30 seconds.
> > > >
> > > > The equivalent config in Kafka seems to be metadata.max.age.ms (
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#consumerconfigs_metadata.max.age.ms
> > > ),
> > > > which has a default value of 5 minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Other than that, I’m in favor. I agree, this should be on by default.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again,
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023, at 08:26, Leonard Xu wrote:
> > > > > Thanks Qingsheng for driving this, enable the dynamic partition
> > > > > discovery would be very useful for kafka topic scale partitions
> > > > > scenarios.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 for the change.
> > > > >
> > > > > CC: Becket
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Leonard
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Jan 13, 2023, at 3:15 PM, Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1 for the change. I think this is beneficial for users and is
> > > > compatible.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Jark
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 14:22, 何军 <xuehaijux...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1 for this idea, we have enabled kafka dynamic partition
> > discovery
> > > in
> > > > >>> all
> > > > >>>> jobs.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 

Best,
Benchao Li

Reply via email to