Congratulations, Rui

Best,
Junrui

Matt Wang <wang...@163.com> 于2023年2月21日周二 09:51写道:

> Congrats Rui
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Matt Wang
>
>
> ---- Replied Message ----
> | From | yuxia<luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> |
> | Date | 02/21/2023 09:22 |
> | To | dev<dev@flink.apache.org> |
> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Rui Fan |
> Congrats Rui
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "Samrat Deb" <decordea...@gmail.com>
> 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org>
> 发送时间: 星期二, 2023年 2 月 21日 上午 1:09:25
> 主题: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Rui Fan
>
> Congrats Rui
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 10:28 PM, Anton Kalashnikov <kaa....@yandex.com>
> wrote:
>
> Congrats Rui!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Anton Kalashnikov
>
> On 20.02.23 17:53, Matthias Pohl wrote:
> Congratulations, Rui :)
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 5:10 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> Congrats Rui!
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 3:19 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone
>
> On behalf of the PMC, I'm very happy to announce Rui Fan as a new Flink
> Committer.
>
> Rui Fan has been active on a small scale since August 2019, and ramped
> up
> his contributions in the 2nd half of 2021. He was mostly involved in
> quite
> demanding performance related work around the network stack and
> checkpointing, like re-using TCP connections [1], and many crucial
> improvements to the unaligned checkpoints. Among others: FLIP-227:
> Support
> overdraft buffer [2], Merge small ChannelState file for Unaligned
> Checkpoint [3], Timeout aligned to unaligned checkpoint barrier in the
> output buffers [4].
>
> Please join me in congratulating Rui Fan for becoming a Flink
> Committer!
>
> Best,
> Piotr Nowojski (on behalf of the Flink PMC)
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22643
> [2]
>
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-227%3A+Support+overdraft+buffer
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26803
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27251
>
>
>

Reply via email to