Hi LijieThank you for pointing this out. I've corrected it [1]. Also, this page [2] still shows 178 and 229 as available, which is why I
picked it up.ThanksKarthi[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-312%3A+Prometheus+Sink+Connector[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+ProposalsOn May 15, 2023, at 9:37 PM, Lijie Wang
<wangdachui9...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Karthi,I think you are using a wrong FLIP id, the FLIP-229 has already be
used[1].[1]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-229%3A+Introduces+Join+Hint+for+Flink+SQL+Batch+JobBest,LijieMartijn
Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 04:44写道：Hi Karthi,Thanks for the FLIP and opening up the discussion. My main
question is: whyshould we create a separate connector and not use and/or improve theexisting integrations with Prometheus? I would like
to understand more sothat it can be added to the motivation of the FLIP.Best regards,MartijnOn Mon, May 15, 2023 at 6:03 PM Karthi
Thyagarajan <kar...@karthitect.com>wrote:> Hello all,>> We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-229:
Prometheus Sink> Connector [1] where we propose to provide a sink connector for Prometheus> [2] based on the Async Sink [3].
Looking forward to comments andfeedback.> Thank you.>>
[1]>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-229%3A+Prometheus+Sink+Connector> [2] https://prometheus.io/>
[3]> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink>
