Hey, Sorry to disturb this voting, but after discussing this thoroughly with Chesnay and Stefan Richter I have to vote: -1 (binding) mainly to suspend the current voting thread. Please take a look at my mail at dev mailing list.
Best, Piotrek czw., 29 cze 2023 o 14:59 feng xiangyu <xiangyu...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Xiangyu > > yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年6月29日周四 20:44写道： > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best regards, > > Yuxia > > > > ----- 原始邮件 ----- > > 发件人: "Yuepeng Pan" <flin...@126.com> > > 收件人: "dev" <dev@flink.apache.org> > > 发送时间: 星期四, 2023年 6 月 29日 下午 8:21:14 > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-309: Support using larger checkpointing interval when > > source is processing backlog > > > > +1 non-binding. > > > > > > Best. > > Yuepeng Pan > > > > > > ---- Replied Message ---- > > | From | Jingsong Li<jingsongl...@gmail.com> | > > | Date | 06/29/2023 13:25 | > > | To | dev<dev@flink.apache.org> | > > | Cc | flink.zhouyunfeng<flink.zhouyunf...@gmail.com> | > > | Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-309: Support using larger checkpointing > > interval when source is processing backlog | > > +1 binding > > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:03 AM Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We would like to start the vote for FLIP-309: Support using larger > > > checkpointing interval when source is processing backlog [1]. This FLIP > > was > > > discussed in this thread [2]. > > > > > > Flink 1.18 release will feature freeze on July 11. We hope to make this > > > feature available in Flink 1.18. > > > > > > The vote will be open until at least July 4th (at least 72 hours), > > following > > > the consensus voting process. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Yunfeng and Dong > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-309%3A+Support+using+larger+checkpointing+interval+when+source+is+processing+backlog > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l1l7f30h7zldjp6ow97y70dcthx7tl37 > > >
