Hi ,
I am working on FLINK-33365. I am making good progress;  thanks Sergey for your 
fabulous feedback. A lot of the query cases are now working with the latest fix 
but not all. I think it is pragmatic to revert the lookup join predicate 
pushdown support, so we can release a functional JDBC connector. I can then 
work on fixing the remaining FLINK-33365 query cases, which should not take too 
long, but I am out until Thursday this week so will be looking at it then,
       Kind regards, David.


From: Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
Date: Friday, 5 January 2024 at 14:24
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc, release candidate 
#1
Hi,

Hmmm, it would have been good to mark the Jira ticket as a Blocker
then for the JDBC connector. Since it's marked as Critical, it doesn't
appear. It has also been open for multiple months, so it doesn't
really feel like a Blocker. I'm +0 with including this fix, but then
we should either get that in quickly or revert FLINK-16024, especially
since this bug ticket has been open for multiple months. Right now, it
means that we don't have a working JDBC connector for Flink 1.17 and
Flink 1.18. That shouldn't be OK.

Thanks,

Martijn

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:31 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for driving this
>
> the thing which makes me thinking about -1 (not sure yet and that's why
> asking here) is that there is FLINK-33365 [1]
> mentioned as a blocker for JDBC connector release at [2]
> Since the reason for that is FLINK-16024 [3] as also was explained in
> comments for [1].
>
> So should we wait for a fix of [1] or revert [3] for 3.1.x and continue
> releasing 3.1.2?
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33365
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdkm5qshqozow9sljz6c0qjft6kg9cwc
>
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16024
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:19 PM Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > 3.1.2, as follows:
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This version is compatible with Flink 1.16.x, 1.17.x and 1.18.x.
> >
> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> > [2], which are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > A5F3BCE4CBE993573EC5966A65321B8382B219AF [3],
> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > * source code tag v3.1.2-rc1 [5],
> > * website pull request listing the new release [6].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Release Manager
> >
> > [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12354088
> > [2]
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-connector-jdbc-3.1.2-rc1
> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > [4]
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1691/
> > [5] https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/releases/tag/v3.1.2-rc1
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/707
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey

Unless otherwise stated above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU

Reply via email to