For official purposes, this RC is cancelled and a new one will be created :)

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 3:42 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The blocker issue [1] was fixed
>
> huge thanks to David Radley and Benchao Li for working on this
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33365
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 4:54 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> > I am working on FLINK-33365. I am making good progress;  thanks Sergey
> for
> > your fabulous feedback. A lot of the query cases are now working with the
> > latest fix but not all. I think it is pragmatic to revert the lookup join
> > predicate pushdown support, so we can release a functional JDBC
> connector.
> > I can then work on fixing the remaining FLINK-33365 query cases, which
> > should not take too long, but I am out until Thursday this week so will
> be
> > looking at it then,
> >        Kind regards, David.
> >
> >
> > From: Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > Date: Friday, 5 January 2024 at 14:24
> > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release flink-connector-jdbc, release
> > candidate #1
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hmmm, it would have been good to mark the Jira ticket as a Blocker
> > then for the JDBC connector. Since it's marked as Critical, it doesn't
> > appear. It has also been open for multiple months, so it doesn't
> > really feel like a Blocker. I'm +0 with including this fix, but then
> > we should either get that in quickly or revert FLINK-16024, especially
> > since this bug ticket has been open for multiple months. Right now, it
> > means that we don't have a working JDBC connector for Flink 1.17 and
> > Flink 1.18. That shouldn't be OK.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:31 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for driving this
> > >
> > > the thing which makes me thinking about -1 (not sure yet and that's why
> > > asking here) is that there is FLINK-33365 [1]
> > > mentioned as a blocker for JDBC connector release at [2]
> > > Since the reason for that is FLINK-16024 [3] as also was explained in
> > > comments for [1].
> > >
> > > So should we wait for a fix of [1] or revert [3] for 3.1.x and continue
> > > releasing 3.1.2?
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33365
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdkm5qshqozow9sljz6c0qjft6kg9cwc
> > >
> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16024
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:19 PM Martijn Visser <
> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > > > 3.1.2, as follows:
> > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > > >
> > > > This version is compatible with Flink 1.16.x, 1.17.x and 1.18.x.
> > > >
> > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> > > > * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org
> > > > [2], which are signed with the key with fingerprint
> > > > A5F3BCE4CBE993573EC5966A65321B8382B219AF [3],
> > > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > > > * source code tag v3.1.2-rc1 [5],
> > > > * website pull request listing the new release [6].
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Release Manager
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12354088
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-connector-jdbc-3.1.2-rc1
> > > > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > [4]
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1691/
> > > > [5]
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-jdbc/releases/tag/v3.1.2-rc1
> > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/707
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sergey
> >
> > Unless otherwise stated above:
> >
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>

Reply via email to