Good pointing. I guess, marking it as deprecated and pointing to GitHub Actions as the new workaround would be a better way than removing it entirely for now.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:47 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > thanks for driving this > agree GHA seems working ok > > however to be on the safe side what if we mark it for removal or deprecated > first > and then remove together with dropping support of 1.17 where GHA is not > supported IIUC? > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:42 AM Matthias Pohl > <matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm wondering whether anyone has objections against removing the Azure > > Pipelines Tutorial to "set up CI for a fork of the Flink repository" in > the > > Flink wiki. Flink's GitHub Actions workflow seems to work fine for forks > > (at least for 1.18+ changes). No need to guide contributors to the > > flink-mirror repository to create draft PRs. And it's not used that > often, > > anyway [2]. > > > > Best, > > Matthias > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Azure+Pipelines#AzurePipelines-Tutorial:SettingupAzurePipelinesforaforkoftheFlinkrepository > > [2] https://github.com/flink-ci/flink-mirror/pulls?q=is%3Apr > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey >
