Hi everyone, Thanks for your valuable discussion and feedback!
Our discussions have been going on for a while. If there are no more concerns, I would like to start the vote thread after 72 hours,thanks again! Please let me know if you have any concerns, thanks! Best, Jinzhong On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:56 PM Jinzhong Li <lijinzhong2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yue, > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > 1. Does Grouping Remote State Access only support asynchronous > interfaces? > > --If it is: IIUC, MultiGet can also greatly improve performance for > > synchronous access modes. Do we need to support it ？ > > Yes. If we want to support MultiGet on existing synchronous access mode, > we have to introduce a grouping component akin to the AEC described in > FLIP-425[1]. > I think such a change would introduce additional complexity to the current > synchronous model, and the extent of performance gains remains uncertain. > Therefore, I recommend only asynchronous interfaces support "Grouping > Remote State Access", which is designed to efficiently minimize latency in > accessing remote state storage. > > > 2. Can a simple example be added to FLip on how to use Batch to access > > states and obtain the results of states on the API? > > Sure. I have added a code example in the Flip[2]. Note that the multiget > in this Flip is an internal interface, not a user-facing interface. > > > 3. I also agree with XiaoRui's viewpoint. Is there a corresponding Config > > to control the state access batch strategy? > > Yes, we would offer some configurable options that allow users to adjust > the behavior of batching and grouping state access (eg. batching size, > etc.). > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-425%3A+Asynchronous+Execution+Model > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-426%3A+Grouping+Remote+State+Access#FLIP426:GroupingRemoteStateAccess-CodeExampleonHowtoAccessStateUsingBatch > > Best, > Jinzhong Li > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 5:52 PM yue ma <mayuefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jinzhong, >> >> Thanks for the FLIP. I have the following questions: >> >> 1. Does Grouping Remote State Access only support asynchronous interfaces? >> --If it is: IIUC, MultiGet can also greatly improve performance for >> synchronous access modes. Do we need to support it ？ >> --If not, how can we distinguish between using Grouping State Access >> in >> asynchronous and synchronous modes? >> 2. Can a simple example be added to FLip on how to use Batch to access >> states and obtain the results of states on the API? >> 3. I also agree with XiaoRui's viewpoint. Is there a corresponding Config >> to control the state access batch strategy? >> >> -- >> Best, >> Yue >> >
