Hello Muhammet and Jeyhun! Thanks for your comments! @Jeyhun:
> Could you please elaborate more on how the new approach will be backwards compatible? In the FLIP I provide how the current Factories in JDBC would be changed with this refactor, do you mean something different? Can you be more specific with your request? On May 14, 2024 at 12:32 +0200, Jeyhun Karimov <je.kari...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > Thanks for driving this FLIP. +1 for it. > > Could you please elaborate more on how the new approach will be backwards > compatible? > > Regards, > Jeyhun > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:00 AM Muhammet Orazov > <mor+fl...@morazow.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Hey Lorenzo, > > > > Thanks for driving this FLIP! +1 > > > > It will improve the user experience of using JDBC based > > connectors and help developers to build with different drivers. > > > > Best, > > Muhammet > > > > On 2024-05-13 10:20, lorenzo.affe...@ververica.com.INVALID wrote: > > > > Hello dev! > > > > > > > > I want to share a draft of my FLIP to refactor the JDBC connector to > > > > improve its extensibility [1]. > > > > The goal is to allow implementers to write new connectors on top of the > > > > JDBC one for Table API with clean and maintainable code. > > > > > > > > Any feedback from the community is more and welcome. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kl_AikMlqPUI-LNiPBraAFVZDRg1LF4bn6uiNtR4dlY/edit?usp=sharing > >
